Brockhampton SATURATION II
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
alman219
August 26th 2017


40 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah imma make that a playlist cuz that looks fuego

TumsFestival
August 26th 2017


2470 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

needs MILK

Ryus
August 26th 2017


37885 Comments


milk lowkey kinda cringe though



rufinthefury
August 26th 2017


4385 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

better than Sat 1

Slex
August 26th 2017


17869 Comments


That sax on Tokyo is the best thing ever

Ryus
August 26th 2017


37885 Comments


"better than Sat 1"

higher highs, lower lows

yeah if they just consolidated my favorite songs on both albums it would be the hardest 4.5 of all time. they have enough material to make a truly spectacular album but its bogged down by other shit eeeghh

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

there really isn't that much filler on either album tbh

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Sat I filler: uhhh maybe Cash, maybe Boys

Sat II filler: Chick

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

agreed on lower lows I love Merlyn but what the fuck was that intro on Gamba

Ryus
August 26th 2017


37885 Comments


i don't know how you define "filler" but what i don't like on this and sat 1 i would just call bad songwriting, especially here

case in point: gamba and sunny especially

EphemeralEternity
August 26th 2017


4937 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@ghost



risky game you're playing there

Ryus
August 26th 2017


37885 Comments


"agreed on lower lows I love Merlyn but what the fuck was that intro on Gamba"

do you mean sunny? because if so, agreed. aint feelin it at all


VaxXi
August 26th 2017


4418 Comments


it says a lot about a band when the general consensus is that a specific stretch of tracks "drags" an album down but its still 4.0s and 4.5s being thrown around.

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

yeah my bad I meant Sunny. that bark he does wtf was that

Ryus
August 26th 2017


37885 Comments


"it says a lot about a band when the general consensus is that a specific stretch of tracks "drags" an album down but its still 4.0s and 4.5s being thrown around. "

i mean the first thirteen tracks of this are absolute fuckin fire so yeahh issa 4

verdant
Emeritus
August 26th 2017


2508 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

: )

luci
August 26th 2017


12844 Comments


I think the fanbase is also more forgiving because they're spoiling us with all this material. Some duds are expected with output this frequent.

verdant
Emeritus
August 26th 2017


2508 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

how come that hasn't worked with my reviews! ! ! ! ? :thinking:

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

wait wtf in what world is Sweet anything like Fake

runaways
August 26th 2017


683 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

"they should take longer than a week to record a project next time"

they literally took longer to work on this one than the first project



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy