Album Rating: 4.0
About to get to bed, went lifting at the gym while listening to Painkiller... such a good and motivating combo m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Brendan getting jacked hard.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Breaking the ice : )
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah dude, today I reached a record of 150lbs rowing on the pulley machine, it was sweet.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I did over 50 reps at various weight levels
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Not been the gym for ages, found it pretty boring haha.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
That's why I bring my music, and also why my gym has a rock climbing facility :]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Ye I should try it with music tbh.
|
| |
you NEED to bring music to the gym. almost unbearable otherwise. but haven't been for ages either, mostly sports these days. mmmm floorball...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I usually like to do cardio stuff on the days I'm not at the gym, like running or doing my Insanity workouts
|
| |
I prefer this album to every 70s album with the exception of Farewell to Kings and Hemispheres.
It's quintessential 80s Prog.
|
| |
This isnt really prog
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Holy fuck was I retarded when I was younger.
A few more spins this morning has lead me to believe that I was wrong.
Signals is a great album.
|
| |
:]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Either I'm getting old or nerdier, I don't know which.
|
| |
"conform or be cast out"
its just like sputnikmusic lol
this is an uneven album but i chalk it up to the "sophomore slump" after the latter day success of moving pics. although these would be the oldest, most experienced sophmores in the history of rock 'n roll :P
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
nah
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
nah [2]
|
| |
its somewhat dull and bland. but it is Rush after all so what is to be expected? their are no truly
good songs on this album...maybe two or three. the production is muddled, the mix is too dense
the year was 1982 and along with some new clothes to greet the new wave Rush decided to go all Flock
Of Seagulls on us. results were mixed at best and in no way is this a 4 or 4.5/5 album. this is an
album which was trying to be ahead of the curve all the while being well behind it. and anyone with
even slight insight into the music "scene" of those times can hear it. and it lacks SONGS
yeah
|
| |
even the reviewer doesn't seem to like this album very much. he keeps making excuses for it. why? it
says he rates it a 4 but the review reads more like a 3.
EDIT: oic. he credits "high quality compositions" with helping to save the album. only thing, their
aren't any here. two or three, as said before. the rest are mundane and mediocre compositions at best
|
| |
|
|
