Album Rating: 1.0

Most hardcore music is very structured actually.

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah, but if you don't get that, it can end up just sounding 'all over the place', which is what I thought at first. Then I realised that actually it fits perfectly. I think the reviewer must have had no idea about that, if you see what I mean.

Album Rating: 1.0

I dunno he name drops plenty other bands who scream as well as saying he liked older Underoath.

Album Rating: 4.0

But for the most part, older Underoath and the other bands he mentioned are slightly more obviously structured upon first listen. Doesn't stop him from being stupid, though, I won't try and say that.

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't think this is a 1, but I do think it's a really boring album. Really bland on all fronts, vocals, song structure, instrumentation,...well everything really. Personally I don't find anything dynamic about this album and I find it hilarious that so many people bash metalcore as a genre, then praise this album, despite being static and uninspired.

They should have kept allowing Adam D to edit their song structures like he did with their previous albums, which many people find to be more enjoyable anyway.

Album Rating: 5.0

^Er...what? This album and the last one are their most popular albums...

Album Rating: 2.0

"^Er...what? This album and the last one are their most popular albums..."

...you mean their last one where Adam D edited a lot of their songs like I said?

And besides...if you read through the posts of all the reviews for this album, quite a few people prefer their older ones, despite liking this one as well.

And lol at you giving this album a 5...doesn't take much to impress does it?

Album Rating: 3.5

homosexuals! just my type!

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Biased,arrogant,& bad written review. Don't rate an album a 1 just b/c you don't like it. I've only heard about ten legitimate 1's in my life. Too many people over-rate or under-rate albums. This album deserves no less than a 3.5.

[quote=Nathanatron]I just came across this review and its honestly one of the most "fanboyish-biased" review I've read. Its sounds like youre just pissed that Underoath are no longer the same whiney screamo-core band they were a few years ago. I, personally thought that Define the Great Line was an incredible step forward for the band. DTGL and LITSOS still have some of those same aspects, but they are blended much better with the heavier sound. Im not a huge fan of the genre in general, but I think that Underoaths new take in the last couple of years is actually really well done and quite enjoyable.[/quote]

Exactly.



Also, this album isn't for everyone. There's no insane guitars or bass,the drums are above average but nothing amazing,and while the vocals are better, they're still not amazing either. What makes this album so good is the musicianship & songwriting. The lyrics are great too.This Message Edited On 12.28.08

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

I'll take the reviewers word for it, as this is the only UnderOath album I've heard

Album Rating: 3.0

dont, as this is only the reviewers word tbh. this album is a big grower.

still havent heard this

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

you would probably like it

Wouldn't waste your time if I were you.

yes this album is good stfu wizard you've changed you used to be cool

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

^

Whatthe??

Album Rating: 2.0

"Biased,arrogant,& bad written review."

I love it when people write stuff like this. Nothing says, "look at how stupid AND arrogant I am" like a sentence like this.

And yea...this album is a total snooze.

erm it's an opinion and lets be honest this review was balls

Album Rating: 4.0

Review did suck, but I'm not sure if it was bad enough for this poor dude to get negged into oblivion lol.

Album Rating: 4.0

Listened to this today and I like it so far.