oh look its the guy who cites how much money this cost to produce as a reason he doesn't like it

answer my question

5.0 classic
Avenged Sevenfold Waking the Fallen
Converge Axe to Fall
Green Day Dookie
Killswitch Engage Alive or Just Breathing
Led Zeppelin Mothership
Linkin Park Hybrid Theory
Megadeth Rust in Peace
Meshuggah Catch Thirtythree
Sublime Sublime
The Beatles 1
Times of Grace The Hymn of a Broken Man
Great album and good review although I don't agree with it.

Album Rating: 4.0

choose a better beatles album pls x.x

i should probably lower my collide with the sky rating if im going to trash other peoples 5's but idk it's p legit

Album Rating: 4.0

i wanna be LITERALLY unique. how do i do that ?? :o

Album Rating: 2.0

Yep that'll be me Grey.

You know the one who still thinks integrity goes a long way when it comes to producing something.

Album Rating: 3.0

"lol are you one of those people that can only jam shit if it's pristine and polished with no noise?"



Not really. Converge's albums are usually pretty noisy, but not so much that it ruins the experience. With

this album, the band purposely added a shit ton of noise, and it adds nothing musically. Naturally it is

displeasing. There is a reason why most producers try to eliminate noise.

Album Rating: 5.0

please stop

noisiness on purpose can be good tho

Album Rating: 5.0

lol he talks about distortion like its something the engineer adds after the clean part's been recorded

Album Rating: 3.0

sixdegrees, it is technically/literally original, but not original in a good way. I don't think technical

originality should automatically make an album better.



Zombicidal, an untouched recording doesn't have this much noise. It definitely was enhanced/added to a large

degree.

Album Rating: 5.0

trantalocked logged on and posted a comment in a thread

Album Rating: 3.0

Be honest, it isn't that hard to come up with the idea of enhancing or adding extra noise to an album. You

already get noise before mastering anyway. So when I sarcastically said "how original," I meant it as in, it

is a pretty lazy method of making an album sound original, and rating 5/5 partially because of that is

stupid. My original feelings never changed whether you agreed with my wording or not.



Remember, the summary of review we are commenting on states that the distortion was basically the difference

between this being commercially successful and being superb. That is ridiculous. If you think a bland wall

of fuzz makes an album a classic rather than a 4/5 then you are out of your mind.

'Damn what the heck happened in here?'

5.0 classic
Avenged Sevenfold Waking the Fallen
Converge Axe to Fall
Green Day Dookie
Killswitch Engage Alive or Just Breathing
Led Zeppelin Mothership
Linkin Park Hybrid Theory
Megadeth Rust in Peace
Meshuggah Catch Thirtythree
Sublime Sublime
The Beatles 1
Times of Grace The Hymn of a Broken Man
Great album and good review although I don't agree with it.

Album Rating: 5.0

Be honest, it isn't that hard to come up with the idea of enhancing or adding extra noise to an album.

Album Rating: 5.0

This does have a lot of "noise" like recordings of bombs being added to one of the songs. At the same time, the guitar tracks on Sometimes and To Here Knows When really do sound that noisy, it's just the mixture of rack effects, pedals, and amps going on. Very little to do with "enhancing" noise levels after recording

Album Rating: 3.0

Now you're making no sense sixdegrees.



"And so? Can you still name any album that came out prior to this that legitimately sounded like it?"



No, I can't. And?



Zombicidal, I don't think it matters exactly how/where the noise was produced. The fact is that it is there.

Album Rating: 3.0

Lol six degrees, you win

"Be honest, it isn't that hard to come up with the idea of enhancing or adding extra noise to an album"

then how was it never done before 1991