Future Trif should note that AAS' comment about this album, melody and mastery is v much on the money
|
| |
Noted.
We will soon find out then Johnny whether our opinions on Loveless are the only thing we do not see eye to eye on concerning MBV or if there are other cases... Exciting times we live in!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
A perfect continuation of Loveless, a definite 5 from me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This has five perfect tracks in my opinion, and four I'm not so crazy about. Usually don't listen to it in full these days
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
this has... tracks, in my opinion
that it does
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Of all the music I've ever listened to, this is definitely music
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
perhaps
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Such a beautiful album, I love how it experiments in its analog production. Lush and wondrous.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
shields' forte
|
| |
Hella lush
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
now we need someone w/ 0.5
|
| |
no we do not
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
ok
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I like this. I'm just questioning what little the experience of listening to this provided for me.
Like, Loveless just gets in your head man.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
yea
|
| |
a lengthy ep of the essentials off this i would 5.0 so hard
|
| |
mood + most of the inessentials are p cool novelty
|
| |
There is nothing essential about this. Remove it from history and nothing would be lost.
|
| |
Unfair to say that given how long Loveless had to mythologise itself. If this had come out in '93, it would be viewed in completely different terms
Bottom line is less to do with the history books and more to do with the fact that Loveless is a production showcase, yet this has superior production
|
| |
i thought it had essentials but i guess not & thank you for the correction
|
| |
|
|
