yeah i tend to rate pretty generously whereas sach rates incredibly harshly. at the end of the day putting a number on something like music is pretty meaningless agreed.

i honestly don't pay attention to most peoples ratings. what youre saying makes perfect sense though to be honest.

Album Rating: 3.0

shame i dont like this because i adore the artwork and album name

how come, mort?

Album Rating: 3.0

i listened to it once, and simply wasnt impressed. I might give it another listen when i feel like it though



If i remember correctly, at the time i thought its dissonance and chaotic structure didnt pay off and wasnt well executed anyway

Album Rating: 4.5

Took a while for me to click with this. But when I did, oh boy!

i haven't heard this, i kinda assumed it might be too technical for me. maybe im doing something wrong.

may check this out later actually

Soullessness Embraced

Album Rating: 5.0

This isn't very accessible but when it clicks whoa

Album Rating: 5.0

p much

Album Rating: 4.5

yes

Album Rating: 4.5

within this sub-sub-genre (dissonant tech death) its pretty accessible tbh

Album Rating: 4.5

"What kind of music are you listening to these days, son?"

"I've been enjoying a lot of dissonant tech death recently."

Album Rating: 4.5

its a fairly distinct style of death metal

Album Rating: 4.5

Not saying it isn't a real thing, I just think it's funny that people go that in-depth when describing music haha

Depends on who I'm talking to. If they're familiar with my music, I'll be more in depth but if not I'll just stick to the basic "punk", "metal" or whatever

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah that's what I do too usually haha.

Album Rating: 5.0

"Album tends not to make sense on first listen tho"



like obscura?

My basic reply is that I listen to a lot of hardcore and metal. Most people have no idea what I'm talking about, even if they like heavy music. My coworker doesn't know the difference between death metal, deathcore and metalcore but he's always asking me about The Acacia Strain