Album Rating: 5.0

What's wrong with 84?

Album Rating: 4.0

god you fuckin dad rockers... zen came out in 84 get with the program





*sigh*

Album Rating: 3.5

Good lad

Good dig as well!

Album Rating: 5.0

what i meant by my post is that there are so many old farts that wont accept the new

there is nothing wrong with 84 but this is masterpiece of an evolved form of post hardcore

Album Rating: 3.5

You say evolved I say bastardisation of the real deal spruced up with tight jeans and haircuts.

Still good though.

Album Rating: 5.0

why exactly a bastardation? and wtf is wrong with the hair they are hispanic for fuck sake

Album Rating: 3.5

Style over substance dude.

When this came out all that was said was how 'cool' the band looked, everyone was indifferent to the music.

It had been done before.

Album Rating: 5.0

then why the legacy? legacies dont form because of tight pants and curly hair , then every thrash band would be legendary

Gonna check this today finally

Album Rating: 5.0

hope you have better ears than zakky boy

Haha hope so

Album Rating: 3.5

As a legacy it's up there with Floyd.

Try hard style over substance legacies formed on the past is more or less all we have had from 2000 onwards dude I'm tellin ya.

Like I say though, still good just done better first time round.

Album Rating: 5.0

i respect your opinion sir only because of the fact that the bands that ripped this off suck so bad

'Gonna check this today finally'

Enjoy!

Album Rating: 3.5

And there completes the circle

Album Rating: 5.0

no point in arguing , some people love Brand New and i cant see why.. guess its the same here

i love this and you cant see why

Album Rating: 3.5

Sorry Rico dude there's some misunderstanding. I can definitely see why people would think this is a classic, I think it's a great album.

Brand New are always the better example to the points raised.

Album Rating: 4.5

CUT AWAY! CUT AWAY!

Album Rating: 3.0

It's no shape of punx either

Album Rating: 5.0

I WRITE TO REMEMBEEEEAAAAAA