Grimes Art Angels
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
wwf
December 4th 2015


7198 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I could see easily overlooking this album's flaws if you at least enjoy the songs. But ugh is it annoying

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
December 4th 2015


17285 Comments


so sugary it gave me diabetes

AmericanFlagAsh
December 4th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

What's annoying about it??

I don't get the review at all. It gives so much praise but bam mediocre rating. Wtf. It's so fun and well produced.

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
December 4th 2015


17285 Comments


it's grating as fuck

AmericanFlagAsh
December 4th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It is a bit sugary. But I mean, you don't have to listen to sad somber music all the damn time.

wtferrothorn
December 4th 2015


5849 Comments


I listen to a shit ton of sugary stuff, but this is fucking overload.
so sugary it gave me diabetes [2]

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
December 4th 2015


17285 Comments


i don't, i love the new t swift album. i like pop music. this is just overload to the max. the vocal effects are awful

wwf
December 4th 2015


7198 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this is grimes flanderizing grimes

AmericanFlagAsh
December 4th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Wow



I wish this came out during the summer, fuck

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
December 4th 2015


17285 Comments


i wish this never came out, fuck

AmericanFlagAsh
December 4th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

TSwift is so fucking generic

At least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should be

Whatever, I'm done. This is awesome.

enedwaith
December 4th 2015


1865 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

never knew pop music elitists existed





treeqt.
December 4th 2015


16970 Comments


At least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should beAt least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should be

treeqt.
December 4th 2015


16970 Comments


grimes is a lot more generic than taylor swift no lie you know this

Keyblade
December 4th 2015


30810 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

naw but she has weird coloured hair and a lisp and sings unintelligibly and really high pitched and shit

MyNameIsPencil
December 4th 2015


6666 Comments


Did someone make a Fart Angels joke yet

because I think Fart Angels is a more appropriate title

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 4th 2015


70256 Comments


At least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts

What pop music should be


the ROFL has been had

RadicalEd
December 4th 2015


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"At least this is experimental and a bit wonky at parts



What pop music should be. "



Omg.

Futures
Contributing Reviewer
December 4th 2015


17285 Comments


v lol

Nocturnalize
December 4th 2015


2463 Comments


I listened to flesh without blood and thought it was kewl

prob gonna check out the whole album soon



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy