Album Rating: 3.5
DRUGS
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Cause after a long time I decided to give 17 minutes of my life to the t/t again
And I loved it as much as the first time
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Wait so I still shouldn't do acid?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I think you should Zack.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
T/t is as iconic as it gets.
|
| |
The entire album holds up immensely well.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
T/t is classic but I find Heavy way more interesting and enjoyable as a whole. Apart from the t/t this is pretty unimpressive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Really interesting how a best selling rock album has few rates here.
|
| |
I still can't believe it actually holds a world record in sales still to this day
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Even more bizarre, it sold more than The Doors...
|
| |
And to add on to the bizarre-ness, now no one even talks about this, let alone remembers it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Title track is elite, everything else is a’ight
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I should write a review for this. This band is underrated
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
By far one of the funniest scenes from the simpsons
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Last three tracks are good/borderline great, first three are sorta lame.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Only enjoy the title track, which incidentally is half the entire albums run time thereabouts. Think this simply never gets talked about because of how different it is to later hard rock & early metal stuff, the psychedelic influences date it severely, ditto the very very outdated sounding production / sound to the instruments in general. It's too tame for the 70s crowd to claim in a nostalgic light, and frankly one hit wonders rarely get much credit, which is what Iron Butterfly are / perceived to be. Frankly given the low number of certifications I find the 30 million claimed sales to be incredibly farfetched. That's Appetite for Destruction levels, no way, not with populations & distribution of music as it was in that era, plus the lack of international market support.
|
| |
|