Album Rating: 4.0
Best Mudvayne. This could've almost been like The Black Album of the 2000s, but they decided to suck afterward.
|
| |
They wanted that money, bro
|
| |
I woke up with a sudden urge to listen to this band. Damn, the nostalgia.
|
| |
Definitely a numetal album that holds up well after a number of years
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Basically their swan album. It seems their ambition just flat-out disappeared after this one.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Kicks ass for its genre and time.
|
| |
A lot of gems on this one
|
| |
"Best Mudvayne. This could've almost been like The Black Album of the 2000s, but they decided to suck afterward."
in stark contrast to metallica, who released only classic albums after the black album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Their new ones good
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
it was always shit
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I'd actually go as far as to say this album is as good as L.D. 50, and in some instances even better, people just didn't like this album because it sacrificed some of the heaviness from L.D. 50 in favour of more melody, but this album is just as prog metalish and mathy as L.D. 50 was.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Great album, not as good as the debut, but still amazing
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The start of the landslide downward. lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Love this band too, but it's a little sad that I only like LD.50 lol.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Their new ones good
As in new one you mean 2009? Or 2013 new?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
There is no 2013 album, so technically the "new" album is the one that's almost 5 years old. It's definitely not good either. It's got brief moments of enjoyment, but it's like a 2.8 record
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
So, point is that this band suck hard now. haha
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yeah this definitely isn't a 1.5, that's just being butthurt over something
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah, I was wondering why I had it so low... seems a bit harsh looking back on it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
That's better I think.
|
| |
|
|