Album Rating: 5.0

k i'm sobered up and i don't understand this review at all whatchu doin andy

Album Rating: 4.0

rules

but i'm sick of people being unable to articulate why they dislike this album.

Album Rating: 4.5

"I think I'm the only guy that really doesn't care for OK Computer"



Nah, I'm the same. Think I've seen a few others say they prefer Radiohead's other stuff too.

-

This reviewer obviously seems to think he's incredibly intelligent (source: self-indulgent language), but there's no real argument here. It's pointing things out and not explaining them - presumably because you can't. Plus, the rating seems a bit low for an album which contains tracks that you admit "pierce" you.

Album Rating: 4.5

i still don't get the hype for this record but i rated it a 4.5 so that i could fit in

Album Rating: 4.0

rules

Album Rating: 3.0

at least By The Way has songs and it's a great album, but Kid A is close to experiments only with almost no melody

Album Rating: 5.0

what the fuck everything except for maybe Treefingers has a melodic line. The shit are people talking about in here? I mean I get people don't like the album but sometimes the reasoning on this site numbs my mind. Review sucks but I'm not entirely sure if it's serious or not... gave up half-way through and don't want to read 5 pages of comments to find out kk bye

Album Rating: 2.5

so what's a legitimate reason to dislike any album?



btw...just because someone doesn't rate something 4 or above doesn't mean they dislike it in totality

Retarded people shouldn't be allowed to write kid A or OK computer reviews ,this review is the biggest example of that

Album Rating: 4.0

albums good

Album Rating: 5.0

well, Klap seems to genuinely dislike the album for subjective reasons. And of course their subjective reason is valid, but saying something like How to Disappear Completely is bad because it's a depressing mood is half-assed. Most negative criticisms lobbed at generally well accepted albums tend to always be half-assed and come off that way. It's not necessary wrong, I do it to, but when you compile your half-assed opinions into a half-assed review full of non-sequitors, well that's what I mean by having an invalid opinion. Not invalid BECAUSE of the opinion, but rather how it's expressed. 2.5 means he (or she) liked parts of the album but equally disliked other parts of the album. For both the parts that they liked and disliked, from what I read, the reviewer does not do a good job denoting what exactly encompasses their opinion. Example: using a metaphor such as "like wearing a t-shirt in a snowstorm" doesn't actually say anything at all. Therefore, half-assed.

Album Rating: 5.0

I honestly hope that clarifies my point stabbler... and reading my original comment again I realize that I was a bit ambiguous about when I was referring to the comments, and when I was reffering to the review. "I get people don't like the album but sometimes the reasoning on this site numbs my mind" in this I was specifically referring to the review. Sorry

pos roty

fucking seriously

Album Rating: 4.0

ITS COOL TO HATE

Album Rating: 4.0

words of truth

Pretty ballsy review andy

Album Rating: 2.0

My goodness, my review for this is going to be massive, possibly my magnum opus.

This might be the worst review I've ever read.