Album Rating: 3.7 | Sound Off
Lol it might be too high for a lot of people to count.
|
| |
actually luckily I think it's only like on 5 different albums
that being Marrow, this, Coldworld, An Autumn for Crippled Children and one other I'm forgetting
oh Hawks get the new Suidakra! :]
|
| |
album art is perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Suidakra are ok but their newer albums are kinda boring
|
| |
their new one that was out today is good, I'd recommend trying it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.7 | Sound Off
I'll check that one out. Can't hurt giving it a shot I guess.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
suidakra suck
a few of the songs here are excellent but most of them do nothing for me.
|
| |
idk I like AA in early highschool then just got really bored with their style and dropped them completely. wont be getting this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
this is their worst album
|
| |
Check out the new Vintersorg Jordpuls, it`s better than the last AA.
IMO Twilight Of The Thunder God is the best AA.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
^agreed
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This band and Kataklysm I've heard referred to a lot in the same breath. Which albums should I go for (think I love DT Character/Kalmah Black Watlz) ? Is there a difference? I know even my dad loves Amon Amarth and he thinks my metal is crap compared to his (born 56, loves Zeppelin and onwards)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
kataklysm are terrible stay away from them
|
| |
lol kataklysm
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I just ordered the last box set available : ))))))))))
|
| |
kataklysm sounds nothing like amon amarth lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
@HSTThomas:
shut the fucking fuck up.
yo are we still talkin bout super smash bros.?
dude, jigglypuff
|
| |
Is it Pokémon time already?
|
| |
that cover. just cheesy. love it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
@Thomas- I'll look into the things you mention and see what I can re-work. But this:
I do get what you mean but the adjectives make the description feel a bit vague, the music's sound a little murky. You don't have to be an A-Class musician or have to spew out a whole dictionary of musical terminology but a bit more specifity would help as it does help you at some points such as here
I'll disagree with. I think going any more in-depth about the styles of the melodies and the nature of the chord progressions (which in and of itself is what many would consider "musically technical") without using more adjectives would involve saying things that may be too musically technical for a reader who has never picked up a guitar before, and delving into the nitty-gritty of every single component of the album will make me sound like I'm rambling and will certainly lose the short attention span of 90% of readers. For a band that has more nuance to their sound it is probably worth doing, but not for a cut-and-dry band like Amon Amarth. Reviewing is a delicate balance between specificity and more general descriptions.
EDIT- But I did add a bit to the third paragraph to give it more substance.
|
| |
|
|