The Named The Named
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Fugue
November 7th 2009


7371 Comments



EDIT: ok it's not there anymore, I guess the mods/staff/whoever decides over these things have already taken all the applications into account and don't want any more atm. Oh well, at least I marked my Crossbreed review in there :-)


Really, aww I was gonna put my Julian Casablancas review in, oh well...

Metalstyles
November 7th 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

yeah, I would've put this review in there too, but I think the ones I listed are prety ok too so i'm not exactly beat down because of it haha

Meatplow
November 7th 2009


5523 Comments


Magnus, do you have a last.fm or email? I have a link I want to send you.

Metalstyles
November 7th 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

you are already on my last.fm, look closer haha ;)

Meatplow
November 7th 2009


5523 Comments


My mistake, so many people have added me. Also it says you are from Estonia, that would make you the second Estonian i've knowingly communicated with over the internet.

Check your inbox, you too Trey.

bloc
November 7th 2009


70880 Comments


so guys, i finally listened to this album and ummmmm yeah, it rapes.

Willie
Moderator
November 7th 2009


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I'm scared to check out their older stuff because there's no way I could be as good as this.

bloc
November 7th 2009


70880 Comments


they have old stuff? i thought this was a debut!

Willie
Moderator
November 7th 2009


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I'm not positive if there is old stuff. I only know that this band was together and then broke up and there's another album listed on the Sputnik discography.

bloc
November 7th 2009


70880 Comments


whoa, didn't even check the band page on sputnik. album dates all the way back to 2001. prolly will check out.

Willie
Moderator
November 7th 2009


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I will for sure so I'll get back to you. I just don't have high expectations.

Crysis
Emeritus
November 8th 2009


17652 Comments


Gratz on the feature Metalstyles

ckypro3
November 8th 2009


204 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

album rules

IkarugaSoul
November 8th 2009


41 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Silly band name, sillier track names, but undeniably fun music.

Willie
Moderator
November 8th 2009


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

What is your rating?

IkarugaSoul
November 8th 2009


41 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Haven't heard it enough yet but I'm probably going for 3.5 or 4.

Metalstyles
November 8th 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

get back to me about their debut too Trey, I listed that album in the datbase, but i haven't heard it and I have the same gripe as you; I'm afraid it doesn't measure up to this in any form.



thanks Crysis, means a lot!



IkarugaSoul - well the band name is cool imo, the track names aren't really silly, it's just that the music isn't meant to be deep and whatnot and while there is an undeniable fun factor in the music, overall it's more intense than fun to me. But it's intense in such an awesoem way!



Bloc - glad you're diggin this buddy, i thought you would ;)

Willie
Moderator
November 8th 2009


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

So, I did some research and found that there's more albums out there than what we thought. I haven't listened to any of them, but I did add them all to the band's page here on sputnik.

Metalstyles
November 8th 2009


8576 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I know all but the earliest two (know, not heard haha)

jingledeath
November 8th 2009


7100 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Album is really good. Probably gonna end up between 3.5-4.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy