The Beatles Revolver
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Eliminator
June 9th 2008


2067 Comments


i have a obner

Eliminator
June 9th 2008


2067 Comments


take that bach u fag

Electric City
June 9th 2008


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

if ap music theory taught me anything, it's that 75% of chords are V-I.

FlawedPerfection
Emeritus
June 9th 2008


2807 Comments


If this is just meant to be a description of popular music, then bear in mind that roughly half of the songs on this album are more harmonically complex than your average J.S. Bach composition.


True, I wasn't referring to songs here specifically (although I did make it seem like I was).

Neoteric
June 9th 2008


3243 Comments


this review is more lol than MM8's revolver review

has someone said that already?

Shattered_Future
June 9th 2008


1641 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Wow. I clicked on this review expecting a 5 or a 1. Go me.



Review's written well, aside from grammar, but the ideas are totally wrong. Not only that, it's totally snobby.



I happen to love Tchaicovsky, and I also love this album. Why not experience both?

Neoteric
June 9th 2008


3243 Comments


Wow. I clicked on this review expecting a 5 or a 1. Go me.
it says the rating on the frontpage

but yeah, review is kinda dumb.


Attention Whore
June 9th 2008


42 Comments


You failed at life.

Fort23
June 9th 2008


3776 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Honestly this was idiotic.




what the review, the thread or both?

Shattered_Future
June 9th 2008


1641 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it says the rating on the frontpage




Well, clicking on reviews from the forums doesn't show the rating...



Sure, it was simple (not as much as he said, but still somewhat simplistic), but writing something simple that sounds this good is just as hard as writing something a symphony. Breaking out of that "oh, we've heard this before" rut with simple song and chord structures is nigh impossible. Kudos to The Beatles for doing that.

El_Goodo
June 9th 2008


1016 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Anyone defending this review is an idiot trying to look open minded. If his reasoning is that it's not as complex as Bach then obviously he does not enjoy any mainstream work, and this review is completely pointless.



All I have to say to you is roll over Beethoven and tell Tchaikovsky's the news.

Eliminator
June 9th 2008


2067 Comments


anyone complaining about this review is an idiot

Cuban Pete
June 9th 2008


3814 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lol

Eliminator
June 9th 2008


2067 Comments


yes that is what i said

Cuban Pete
June 9th 2008


3814 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I wasn't trying to be funny, you retard. That's really what she said.
it's still funny tbh

MrKite
June 9th 2008


5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

few things said in this thread have been funny.

foreverendeared
June 9th 2008


14745 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

by "few things" do you mean nothing? cause then i'd agree

nice dig by the wayThis Message Edited On 06.09.08

SyrianRue
June 10th 2008


2 Comments


I wasn't trying to be funny, you retard. That's really what she said.

who is sheee

Fort23
June 10th 2008


3776 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

what does mrkite mean?

Fort23
June 10th 2008


3776 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

how ironic



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy