The Mars Volta The Bedlam in Goliath
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
kmagnum
January 28th 2008


81 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I wouldn`t mind it being a negative review if it was actually well written



Congratulations you are the king of f a g g o t r y and your throne awaits

Volta
January 28th 2008


54 Comments


Yeah, the TMV fanbase sure was weakened after Amputechture man. At the New Year's show, everyone was ecstatic, the place was filled. And look around, their singles go for around $50 and their one DVD from 2003 is impossible to buy. These guys are just destined for disaster huh?

kmagnum
January 28th 2008


81 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Wow honestly re-reading that review I think I hate you as a human being

cometuesday
January 28th 2008


959 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Can we just start banning anyone who writes or comments on a Mars Volta review from now on?

Wait, shi[i][/i]t.

Confessed2005
January 28th 2008


5577 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't think I'd be able to sit through this the whole way through.



I have trouble with De-Loused and I really like that album. I have a feeling I'll hold this in the same regard as I do Amputechture.

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
January 28th 2008


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Just got this with the Pink Floyd cover as bonus track.



I'm kinda scared of listening to this now, haha.

HighandDriving
January 28th 2008


3288 Comments


Don't be scared to listen to it, be scared to write a review for it with a rating less then 3.
Unless you throughly enjoy verbal rapage.

ptree
January 28th 2008


10 Comments


look now PTSSdashiz is making people scare to listen to the mars volta, clearly one of the worst reviewers ever created, blasphemy!

HighandDriving
January 28th 2008


3288 Comments


Oh and I forgot, what's even more scary is you get fucking idiots like ptree spouting retarded comments.
Whats worst is these idiots just don't know when to leave or stfu.

Big Baby Jesus
January 28th 2008


549 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Honestly, the review is way too biased and too short. It's already obvious that TMV is either a band you love or hate, I felt like it could've been a lot longer and more informative.



As a matter of fact, I don't really like any of the reviews for this album so far. At least iluvatar made his average review entertaining and funny.



I got the CD today from my lone surviving independent record store, they were selling it early, so I've already listened to the whole thing almost 3 times, and it's between 3.5 - 4.5.This Message Edited On 01.28.08

AtavanHalen
January 28th 2008


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I disagree a lot, but it's still a good review.

TimeToTurnTheTide
January 29th 2008


208 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

@BBJ: this review is of ample length imo considering the current vogue is writing short, concise rev's.



I like De-loused, but am neither here nor there with this band. Despite the slating of this album, you still give it a 2.5. This makes me think that it is actually quite decent?



However, i did quite like the review

Acre
January 30th 2008


847 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Ptree, why do I get the feeling that you're just John A. Hanson in disguise? ;)





kmagnum
January 30th 2008


81 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

you obviously aren't a very good writer with a 64% approval

BattleOfSerenity
January 30th 2008


186 Comments


I have to say, I've never even heard the Mars Volta before, but this album does seem a bit overrared by the TMV fanboys here, and most of the ones not giving approval here are not giving reasons.

I wish people would stop pointlessly negging.
Well written review.

Altmer
January 30th 2008


5711 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

This album is just TMV being TMV really, except slightly less ambient wank.



Which just really means it's a decent record, but it could be better if they trimmed some of the fat. That goes for every TMV album, which is why I don't rate any TMV more than a 4 really.



It's a good album. Great, in fact. TMV just need to learn that they shouldn't pad song lengths unnecessarily.

garbjorifan
January 31st 2008


1 Comments


it's a great album, filled with annoying clicks and scratches that make me glad i just downloaded. concept album my ass. they went to the extreme, imo. omar needs to go back into the studio and actually produce a listenable album.

lame.

i would rate it a -3.5 for wasting my precious bandwidth, bah!This Message Edited On 01.31.08

Chewie
February 1st 2008


4544 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ya, im very interested in getting this now, but i don't think chickenfish or ptree understand the english language. "Was This Review Well Written?" Never neg a review because you disagree with it. He did a good job of backing his points and saying what he liked and disliked. If you are going to bash him based only because you disagree with the rating, then you are faggots;)

MoonlightBleeding
February 1st 2008


452 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I negged it because he went around in circles, and trashed the album to bits in his review while giving it a 2.5.



Not one point was backed properly.

rasputin
February 6th 2008


14967 Comments


Funny how all the mars volta fanboys think this review is poorly written. Every person that has a problem with it has a huge ALBUM RATING: 4/4.5 in red in their comment.
I neither like nor dislike the mars volta (I've only listened to a couple of songs), and I think this review is well-written. Good job.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy