Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

@mudvaynian and chan: Maybe he thinks you only vote yes on a review if you agree with the rating?



I dunno, I can't understand stevo's [attempted] logic.

Album Rating: 4.5

I dunno wut was so confusing about that comment honestly I said bassically what you said Otisbum. And yes because if you look back you will see users like Mister Mop who seemingly only voted yes because they agreed with the rating.

Album Rating: 2.5

Stevo2112 logic is kinda biased of how biased people can be. In the end, he remains the biased one.



Anyways:



I like sharks.

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I don't particularly like dragonforce much, and I like the sharks (Natal rugby team) - but I guess this is the wrong forum for them. . .

Album Rating: 1.0

Crusaders rule the sharks. Not just cause they win, but cause they're all round awesome.

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I'll give you that!! Sometimes I think that the sharks go out of their way to make the crusaders look good. Also the sharks have made losing into a kind of art form. Still we have cool beaches in Durban

Album Rating: 5.0

I agree with you on one point that it is repetitive but I only felt this way after listening to the cd once or twice. I think the fact that the songs are all around 7 minutes long makes it harder to warm up to them. You made some good points and i do think they often play solos to be show offs but i don't think the songs are repetitive.

Well, you must admit that they tend to rely on samey song structures. Still, it doesn't bother me that much as DragonForce is a band I tend to binge on for a while, set it aside, then come back to it later and binge again.
The repetitiveness is something I forgive as it's just great to let loose and mosh to.

Album Rating: 2.0

I'm not sure if I could get going to this stuff, but I could defiently enjoy a show by them.

Album Rating: 5.0

You're right I think they definitely have the same song structures. I just really don't think they're all that repetitive. Of course thats just my opinion.

Well, by definition using the same structures is repetitive. DragonForce are experimenting with their sound somewhat, and I would really appreciate if the next step they take is to try a few different formats.

Album Rating: 5.0

Sounds good to me

They definitely should try different song structures, and maybe try songs with only 1 or 2 memorable solos

Album Rating: 3.0

They definitely should try different song structures, and maybe try songs with only 1 or 2 memorable solos

Album Rating: 1.5

[quote=Altmer]so um is it cool to hate on these guys now just because they play power metal and because the genre is cheesy?

[/quote]

That's why I like Power Metal

Album Rating: 3.0

Saying the guitars are the same, or the songs are the same, mostly means that, that person didn't really listen to it close enough, you probably don't like power Metal, kinda like me, some bands catch my eye, but most don't in this genre, but I got to admidt this album to a lot of talent to make.

I agree with you completley. The bands guitarist's are somewhat over rated to. They depend on there guitar effects more than there song writing skills.

Album Rating: 3.0

Interesting thing about this band- there aren't many fence-sitters. Most folk either love them or hate them!



Personally, I think they're good musicians, but I can't listen to them much as they do get boring.



This was a good review, most of the ones on this album are.

Album Rating: 1.5

Finally, someone who has the same opinion I have about this band. Sure, they are awesome musicians, but all they do is shred. With such musical ability, one would expect a lot more variety. I feel this band is truly wasting its potential. As for the review, I believe it was good. A little advice: try to not use curse words. They get censored and it looks kind of weird to have a bunch of **** in you review

Not even 5 chickenfish, not even 5.