I mentioned grunge because I think it exemplifies MSLG's "heavy question". There were tons of louder bands in the 90's, but that didn't mean that bands like SG and AiC in particular weren't heavy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yeah, that's what I meant, I really think albums like Sabotage are heavier than most Thrash or Grunge, even tho I still respect them
|
| |
I mean albums like MoP, PSBWB and StD are as heavy as it gets for the 80's, but this album was, quite possibly, heavier for its time than any other album ever made.
Big words of course.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Sabotage > This (if we talk about heaviness)
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I'm with ya there Mr, but for the time if came out, I'm doubtful anything touched MOR
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
what about Purple's In Rock?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"only the mainstream: Nirvana, PJ, Soundgarden, AiC, L7, Bush, etc."
Check out tad man. they should've been as big as some of those other bands from that era.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
The best thing about grunge is that it leads to Melvins...
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Which in turn leads to Neurosis
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
So many albums from the 90's that I gotta listen to
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
And none more than King For A Day.../Houdini/TSIB I should hope.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"what about Purple's In Rock?"
In Rock doesnt have the thickness of this record. Its not even as heavy as Sabbath's debut
|
| |
In Rock is heavy in a different way.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Unbeatable riffs.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"In Rock doesnt have the thickness of this record."
Agreed but it's louder.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Heaviness > Loudness
Ya can always tweak that good ol volume knob
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
true there, but I really think In Rock is way better
|
| |
In Rock is wild and unconstrained, it's not just heavy because it's loud.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Tworthammer.
|
| |
I love your avatar, Pleb.
|
| |
|
|
