Album Rating: 4.0
yes
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
wow so this is incredible
Good lad
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
peak of 90s alt rock yea
|
| |
Gonna check this soon, debut is a snooze but am someone optimistic
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Pure phase and this >>> everything else
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
this >>>>>> everything else
I’ve thought so since ‘97
|
| |
> a snooze
> 3.0
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Codswallop
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Boring and Bad (3.0 rating equals good before you get your trousers in a twist)
|
| |
it mean it was a craftful snooze with a couple of stirrings, quintessential 3
|
| |
this album might be their best, but the whole spacemen 3/sonic boom/spiritualized/j spacemen extended universe is wack tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Exactly how I feel johnny
|
| |
wdym by extended universe rob
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
"> a snooze
> 3.0
"
not everyone follows your nerd af music rating system my guy
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
snoozes can be good when taken in moderate quantities
|
| |
"wdym by extended universe rob"
all the albums by the two guys (I've heard maybe four albums by them and the acts they are a part of, none "good" for me per se) and a lot of what they contribute production to (tomboy, WEHh)
|
| |
>not everyone follows your nerd af music rating system my guy
apparently thinking that good should be good is controversial these days smh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
you dont have to follow sput rating names verbatim. in fact i bet you dont. who actually reserves 5s for "classic" ? like thats a dumb term to begin with. idk why everyone pushes their rating system onto everyone else.
|
| |
>idk why everyone pushes their rating system onto everyone else.
nah i agree with you i was just meming
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
i know dw still wanted to say it < 3
|
| |
|
|