Album Rating: 4.5
Ima be honest: I love sputnik, but you gotta admit that the elitism on here can be really annoying sometimes. This album deserves way better than a 2.8 average. We all know that’s just because it’s BMTH, and due to their style evolving. Bummer.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Donul: that only proves how I see this site even further tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
im sorry to break it to you but people arent hating on this because of """"elitism""""
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
~proves~
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
""""""""""elitism""""""""""
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"We all know that’s just because it’s BMTH, and due to their style evolving."
Nah, its actually because this sucks hard.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
congratulations!!!! your gyarados evolved into a magikarp
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Whoa bro, idk if i can comprehend such witty remarks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Harder than all that 3edgy5u black metal?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
no
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
don't say you love me fala alamo
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This website has a userbase that on the whole has specific tastes. There is variation in all cases, but I think you can generally know what albums are gonna be well received on this website and which ones won't. I didn't expect this album to be well received on the whole, but it isn't because of "elitism." I used to think the same thing when I saw users shit talk bands/albums I loved. I grew up and stopped caring. I adore this record, but if most users on here don't, I get it and respect that that's their opinion. I also don't give a shit and listen to what I like, whether is't "cool" to or not. This isn't a hard concept imo.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah you can tell that anything with Conor Oberst on it is going to be dickridden into the sun no matter how good it is too tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
is this the part where you talk about "indie darlings" again?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
lmao
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
As self professed hipster indie trash, I see "indie darlings" a term of endearment, though I feel it was not meant as one in his context.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I'm not against the idea, as even some of Oberst's work is pretty alright, but I don't really think his work is good enough to get 5/5 reviews upon what seems like first listen, lmao.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I guess that depends on your rating criteria. I rate things based on how much I enjoy them more than anything. If a 5 is something that you think can only be obtained with time, then yes it's silly, but I give quite a few 5s every year, because it's based on my enjoyment of the albums. An album 20 years old or a few months old both have the same chance to be a 5 for me. If people feel a connor oberst album is worth a 5, well then it is to them at least.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah I just feel like a 5 is something that has to be grown into personally, as if you're blown away on first listen you may end up missing key faults. I undid my 5 for Break My Fucking Sky's Eviscerate Soul (now a 4.5) because that was initial mindfuckery getting the best of me.
|
| |
|
|
