Nah, I think I’m the problem lol
Let’s refocus on this face sitter paradigm - I’m intrigued.
|
| |
2.0 is the true fence sitting rating. 3.0 is a good rating and should be used more often.
Exai is a soft 3.0. I like this one more
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i can translate cottonese, basically it says you're filtered and dumb (his words not mine)
|
| |
"2.0 is the true fence sitting rating. 3.0 is a good rating and should be used more often."
heavily filtered and dumb
|
| |
explain. 3.0 is only the fence sitting score when you inflate your ratings to appease
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"3.0 is a good rating"
based and tautologypilled
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I predict in the next five years 3.0 will overtake 3.5 as my most used rating ye
At the moment I have 2250 more 3.5 ratings than 3.0 but that gap is closing now
|
| |
Well, how people treat 3.0 scores on here suggests otherwise :^)
|
| |
most people on this site believe music is ultimately a force for good though you mongrel
|
| |
Me too you wombat
|
| |
okay *snuggle*
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
cards on the table, gang
reveal your confield rating @everyone
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.3
|
| |
damn it i failed
|
| |
(n/5) x (5-n) where n = jac's rating
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
some predictions
doof: 3.0 (the fence sitter rating)
johnny: 3.0 (the dad IDM rejection rebel rating)
park: 2.0 (the "sach was right all along" rating)
cotton: 3.5 (the google random number generator rating)
|
| |
naw im a sucker for these guys
|
| |
ah so that's why you called my rating cringe
|
| |
nah
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Havey you got me, it's a 3.0 rating from me and...I have no less than seven other Autechre albums rated higher
classic fence sit
|
| |
|
|