Nah, I think I’m the problem lol

Let’s refocus on this face sitter paradigm - I’m intrigued.

2.0 is the true fence sitting rating. 3.0 is a good rating and should be used more often.

Exai is a soft 3.0. I like this one more

Album Rating: 4.5

i can translate cottonese, basically it says you're filtered and dumb (his words not mine)

"2.0 is the true fence sitting rating. 3.0 is a good rating and should be used more often."

heavily filtered and dumb

explain. 3.0 is only the fence sitting score when you inflate your ratings to appease

Album Rating: 4.5

"3.0 is a good rating"



based and tautologypilled

Album Rating: 3.0

I predict in the next five years 3.0 will overtake 3.5 as my most used rating ye



At the moment I have 2250 more 3.5 ratings than 3.0 but that gap is closing now

Well, how people treat 3.0 scores on here suggests otherwise :^)

most people on this site believe music is ultimately a force for good though you mongrel

Me too you wombat

okay *snuggle*

Album Rating: 4.5

cards on the table, gang



reveal your confield rating @everyone

Album Rating: 3.3

damn it i failed

(n/5) x (5-n) where n = jac's rating

Album Rating: 4.5

some predictions



doof: 3.0 (the fence sitter rating)

johnny: 3.0 (the dad IDM rejection rebel rating)

park: 2.0 (the "sach was right all along" rating)

cotton: 3.5 (the google random number generator rating)

naw im a sucker for these guys

ah so that's why you called my rating cringe

nah

Album Rating: 3.0

Havey you got me, it's a 3.0 rating from me and...I have no less than seven other Autechre albums rated higher



classic fence sit