Album Rating: 5.0
i love zep and the beatles but the only thing the beatles are better than zep at is creating pop music agreed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
"we've all got wood and nails?"
WE'RE TONGUE TIED TO A HATING FACTORYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
agreed. beatles > led
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
p much.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
zep have better musicians, beatles better songwriters.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
????
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
STRAWBERRY FIIIELDS FOREVERRRR
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
More than one way to skin a cat.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
didnt anybody tell her
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
how to gracefully disappear in a room
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
she came in thru the bathroom window
then she came up on my sink
b/
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"????"
Page a better guitarist.
Bonham a better drummer.
Jones a better bassist.
Plant a better vocalist.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
[2]
plus they generally made more complex music
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i've not 5'ed any zep album though sooooo ...
it's complicated!
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
from a technical standpoint sure.
|
| |
yeh well dopethrone has 4.3 so shove that up your technicality!1
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Ugh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
zepp generally had better songs, just less consistent albums i think
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i dunno man zepp were pretty damn consistent
once the beatles peaked they were as well but zepp ran shit like a boss from day 1
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
true, maybe cohesive is the word i'm looking for. their albums just felt like collections of songs a lot of the time, whereas the Beatles' one's were usually quite thematic and had lots of cohesion.
|
| |
|
|
