Album Rating: 4.5
Anyone heard the new tracks they are performing live?
"To Be Kind" sounds a lot like Soundtracks for the Blind.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Should be chopped in half....would be the AOTY for me but it's unnecessarily long. I kinda give 5's too easy so far so i'll continue the trend here just to stay consistent but I will bump this down to a 4.5 when I redo my ratings (new to this whole thing).
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's so close, there's just a little too much excess. I don't know if that's a strength or a weakness.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Sakel
|
| |
I never realised until this year how many fanboys this group has.
|
| |
This album's very interesting, but was definitely bloated on the first listen. The midsection is beautiful though :']
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The number of fanboys exploded around 2009, when it became really hip and cool to like Swans.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah, that stuff doesn't really matter.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
It's a good album, but I think it could have done with more editing - i.e some of the "mood" pieces do carry on a bit too much. I may give this a better score over time.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Understandable.
|
| |
herd this sux
|
| |
hrd
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I think it's pretty good, but I don't think you will like it much.
|
| |
got first two swans and they rule gonna check out next two chronological yea idk about this
|
| |
ur lying posty
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The album was pretty much met with universal acclaim initially, if you heard it sucked it was most likely anti-hyping. Not saying there is no other reason to think it sucks, though. It's certainly excessive and not for everyone. The Repetition in some of the tracks would definitely grate on some people's nerves.
|
| |
why arent you posting on silentpoatato
|
| |
you're not posty?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Potsy wouldn't 4.5 Mezzanine
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Because he'd 5 it.
|
| |
|
|
