see how pointless writing a bands material off with one small description really is?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
radiohead is pretty bland, but this album certainly isn't. so you're wrong.
|
| |
is it out yet
|
| |
.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
'see how pointless writing a bands material off with one small description really is?'
we're on a site practically specifically made for pedantic shit like that tho lmao
|
| |
sorry buddy, I only go on www.sputnikmusic.com for top-tier, enthralling, mentally stimulating conversation. try again later XD
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
don't ever try to have a stimulating conversation in a radiohead thread again
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
this and in rainbows are best radiohead
|
| |
amnesiac > both combined
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
OKC trumps all ya plebs
|
| |
whats the status boys
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
OK Computer and The Bends are top 2, Clay got it right
After that it goes Kid A > In Rainbows > Amnesiac > Hail to the Thief > The King of Limbs > Pablo Honey
|
| |
fucking rofl
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Amnesiac > In Rainbows > Kid A > OK Computer > The King of Limbs > Hail to Thief > The Bends > Pablo Honey
|
| |
also dead wrong but infinitely less basic than the last ranking
|
| |
something like that
|
| |
more like
in rainbows = kid a>king of limbs>ok computer>hail to the thief>amnesiac>the bends>pablo honey
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Anybody who has OKC lower than 3rd is suspect.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Guys stop
Is the new album out yet
|
| |
"Anybody who has OKC lower than 3rd is suspect."
more like
anybody who has OKC higher than 3rd is suspect
and no unfortunately it is not
|
| |
|
|