Trivium The Crusade
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
LifeInABox
April 5th 2007


3709 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

we're gonna go to the top man, we're gonna be the next Metallica
Lol????

SylentEcho
April 5th 2007


1606 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

The Crusade is Trivium’s way of throwing all of that potential into the nearest incinerator. The bottom line is that this is not what heavy metal is. Metal was a genre built on people who didn’t want to follow current trends, they wanted to break away and do what they love, even if no one looked twice at their music.



/

|

|



I couldn't have said it better.

TheHamburgerman
April 5th 2007


1546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Hey! Someone negged the review!

wakeupdead
April 5th 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Hey! Someone negged the review!
WHY GOD WHY!?!?!?!?!?! probably an offended fanboy. But this review is obviously well written if 54 out of 55 voters think so. And I feel it is well written and I am always right :lol: another lame comment by wakeupdead ;)

clairvoyant
April 5th 2007


765 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

i still dont see all the millions of metallica references beyond unrepentant

Steerpike
April 5th 2007


1861 Comments


You can't hear Heafy tonewhoring Hetfield?

Ire
April 6th 2007


41944 Comments


Hey! Someone negged the review!



ANTI-FAN BOY!!!RUN

clairvoyant
April 6th 2007


765 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off



You can't hear Heafy tonewhoring Hetfield?




Its similar.



But all the music, its not 'OMGZ itz exactly liek master of puppppetsz!!!111'



of course, its not very good music, but not a ton like Metallica

TheHamburgerman
April 6th 2007


1546 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ANTI-FAN BOY!!!RUN




wtf..

The Door Mouse
April 6th 2007


2092 Comments


You can't hear Heafy tonewhoring Hetfield?

This is 10000% true but how many times do you need to bring this up?

Steerpike
April 6th 2007


1861 Comments


He said he didn't see the comparison, so I went for the jugular.

SylentEcho
April 11th 2007


1606 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Brilliant review. Very good read.



I hated this album....but somehow its growing on me.



why....why?

franklouuu
April 11th 2007


31 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Trivium isn't an awful band but it isn't great too. I think that it is an average band. So I voted 2.5 stars.



Some songs are clearly a Metallica ripoff. However, there are other songs that have more influences from other bands like Iron Maiden and Megadeth.



Matt Heafy voice isn't good. However, It sounds better than Hetfield's voice.



I didn't like ur review because u are more interested in attacking the band than critising their music.



And some of ur comments are really ridiculous:



"This World Can’t Tear Us Apart, which boils down to a Celine Dion hit single "



"Becoming the Dragon isn’t far off, as it strongly represents a sped up version of For Whom the Bell Tolls"



"And Sadness Will Seer, a horrid attempt at sorrowful aggression that comes out as a pure nu metal song" - u need to read a Nu Metal definition. There aren't Hip Hop/Rap influences in this song. Metallica is more Nu Metal than this song.



"they’re writing songs that aren’t metal at all" - I though u said trivium "mimic their beloved Metallica".

Yazz_Flute
April 11th 2007


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

nu metal doesn't necesarrily need rap, look at system of a down, or slipknot even



I do enjoy this album, though it's nothing spectacular, there are some very good tracks

carney3110
April 11th 2007


310 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

franklouuu makes some good points but... the album still sucks. As does Trivium. And on the Nu-Metal note, I think he's talking less about the actual music and more about the annoying, pathetically fake attempt at depression/angst that most bands in that genre attempt to capture.

Two-Headed Boy
April 11th 2007


4527 Comments


Some songs are clearly a Metallica ripoff. However, there are other songs that have more influences from other bands like Iron Maiden and Megadeth.

Wow such variety.

Ire
April 11th 2007


41944 Comments


I didn't like ur review because u are more interested in attacking the band than critising their music.


All reviews are biased Einstien.


SynGates
April 12th 2007


2467 Comments


Very true, although it still sucks sometimes.

Cravinov13
April 12th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

It depends on how bias you are when reviewing.



This album is horrible though. Metallica is bad enough now as it is trying to get back to the old days, they don't need a copycat.

jrowa001
April 12th 2007


8752 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this album isnt as good as ascendancy but i still like it. they have much more growing up to in terms of songwriting, i think this album was too much influence-based but i think that their songwriting will get more well-rounded. i love their solos but at times i agree they are badly placed. right now i have this at a 4.5 but itll probably go to a 4 soon as the songs are loosing some of the replay value. awesome band live though, they know how to work the crowd and theyre much heavier too. once they look back at this album i think thyell understand what they must do on their next record, i cant wait



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy