Grimes Art Angels
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Asdfp277
November 20th 2015


25732 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"this is NOT. radio. pop. ugh



5/5"

zakalwe
November 20th 2015


42013 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Does bieber do chipmunky ooohh ohhh ahhhhs over womp womp beats? I'll give it a spin it might be a 3.5

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 20th 2015


70256 Comments


its better than this by far

Asdfp277
November 20th 2015


25732 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

he doesn't do fake ass ~*japanese*~ vocals/instrumentals and overly processed chipmunk indie-pop chick croons agreed 1/5

zakalwe
November 20th 2015


42013 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

See I actually prefer the faux Japanese shite to the real deal Japanese shite. That fucking berk whastherface with all the glam. Total shite.

Judio!
November 20th 2015


8523 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Bumped down my rating. Surprised how much this album is growing off me.

anarchistfish
November 20th 2015


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Ye it grew off me at one point and I came back a few days later and loved it again. Think gyro mightve gone through something similar

DoofusWainwright
November 20th 2015


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

My rating went from an initial 1.5 to a 1.7 then a 1.4 and I've finally settled on a 1.3 and that feels definitive

ShakerFaker
November 20th 2015


215 Comments


This was fun but nothing I'd revisit. Album's like enticing at times but equally off putting same goes for her voice it's super sweet and innocent and whatnot but somehow manages to be annoying.

Keyblade
November 20th 2015


30810 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"this is NOT. radio. pop. ugh







5/5""



nice straw man bro, describing the sound of an album is by no means defending it. all I'm saying is it really doesn't sound like Selena gomez or w/e other lazy comparison. I could absolutely despise this and my point would still stand. shit, I like radio pop so it's not something I'd distance myself or an album I like from



but I guess that goes to show that the main criticism of this album boils down to "it's sounds like radio pop"

ShakerFaker
November 20th 2015


215 Comments


Selena Gomez could easily sing California the production would just change but the way the song's constructed is ideal for radio. That aside, some people think it's shitty radio pop, they're not faulting the album for being radio pop.

mvdu
November 20th 2015


994 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

While Selena could maybe sing "Califorinia," the song would still sound a lot less quirky in her hands. It has the appeal of pop while not sounding exactly like much of it IMO.

anarchistfish
November 20th 2015


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"Appeal for me is that it does sound like radio pop, just more nuanced and personable. Hooks are sweet, bass is sweeter."



this

adr
November 20th 2015


12097 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

some great song on here, but very inconsistent.

alienobserver
November 20th 2015


4512 Comments


"Appeal for me is that it does sound like radio pop, just more nuanced and personable. Hooks are sweet, bass is sweeter."
[2] hard

ShakerFaker
November 20th 2015


215 Comments


Well that's what I mean. Y'all think it's not radio pop because of the way Grimes produces - the high pitched vocal and kinda different instrumentation. But at the end of the day, album relies on hooks and regular pop pacing, which is fine but you've got to understand that you like it for what makes it poppy, not in spite of it

anarchistfish
November 20th 2015


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i like it both for its pop style and how she goes about it and i don't think i've seen anyone else who likes this album say differently



ultimately the style is just a conduit for the songwriting though, which is what makes this so great

Keyblade
November 20th 2015


30810 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"Well that's what I mean. Y'all think it's not radio pop because of the way Grimes produces - the high pitched vocal and kinda different instrumentation. But at the end of the day, album relies on hooks and regular pop pacing, which is fine but you've got to understand that you like it for what makes it poppy, not in spite of it "



no. idk why ur tryna speak for other people and why they like this album lmao but check this out. nobody's saying it's not pop or even radio friendly pop at that, everybody realizes this (at least I hope). in fact I like this because it's streamlined. yall need to chill with this patronizing straw man that people don't even realize why they like this album or are ashamed to admit it's radio friendly



the point being made is that it doesn't really sound like/ripping off anyone in particular as is being insinuated. i mean ur basically making the same point in the bolded part so. you can be different and still be radio friendly you know, and as plane mentioned there are plenty of artists in the top 40 that fit the bill

Keyblade
November 20th 2015


30810 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

as plane mentioned in a past life*

Wolfhorde
November 20th 2015


15387 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Couldn't care less whether something is poppy, has mainstream appeal or whatnot



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy