Radiohead OK Computer
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Mort.
November 26th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

ive literally heard nothing past Kid A because im lazy when it comes to this band

BigPleb
November 26th 2015


65808 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Dude In Rainbows jam it right now!

Futures
Staff Reviewer
November 26th 2015


18112 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

in rainbows is da goat yeah

Mort.
November 26th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

na imma go chronologically from kid a so whatevers after that ill get ot in the next week or so

theBoneyKing
November 26th 2015


24890 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

In Rainbows is easily the best post Kid A album, but you can't go wrong with any of them.

AmericanFlagAsh
November 26th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"the second bit of your soundoff is fucking stupid"

Had to go check but naaaah

It stands

A lot of people will give this a really low rating because they don't like it just and it's so highly rated

AmericanFlagAsh
November 26th 2015


13689 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

And if you don't believe that or don't see that

Well, bye

Futures
Staff Reviewer
November 26th 2015


18112 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it's really stupid

theBoneyKing
November 26th 2015


24890 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I really don't understand the philosophy behind disliking something because it's popular.

Like I generally believe that if most people like it then it must be very good.

theBoneyKing
November 26th 2015


24890 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Most people who are not Top 40 listening drones, that is.

Mort.
November 26th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

nobody dislikes this because its popular, the things you like arent that important

Mort.
November 26th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

flag ash stop being a melon

Mort.
November 26th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"Like I generally believe that if most people like it then it must be very good."



its all about context, especially with this album seeming as its so tailored to the time which it was released.



so in 50 years or so i can see this falling out of favour

alienobserver
November 26th 2015


4512 Comments


thing is this album had a ton of influence/importance in the scene as a whole, but it stands on its own very well without all the accolades people heap on it

claygurnz
November 26th 2015


7832 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

In 50 years people will still love this album imo.

Mort.
November 27th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

some will, but it wont have nearly as much acclaim

CamiloG
November 27th 2015


3036 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I will have respect towards this, but I won't acclaim it

Mort.
November 27th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

its just too contextual to last imo



but then again i fully admit i may be wrong



will be interesting to see how it holds up tho

CamiloG
November 27th 2015


3036 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I think it will hold even in more than 50 years, but I'm just going to respect it.

Mort.
November 27th 2015


26413 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

why do you think it will hold even more than 50 years? just based on the acclaim its already received or another line of reasoning?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy