Lamb of God Into Oblivion
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Orb
March 14th 2026


9657 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I don't agree with this review. As such, as per modern societal expectations, I am unconsciously choosing to invalidate your entire taste in music and disregard you as someone with bad taste in everything.

jrlikestodance
March 14th 2026


7841 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Streets are calling him “thatdeafkid”

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
March 14th 2026


121527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

thatdeafkid [2]

Orb
March 14th 2026


9657 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

:,D

brickhed
Contributing Reviewer
March 15th 2026


1611 Comments


people who neg this just want to live in an echo chamber
most music websites are like that. it genuinely sucks and I haven't even heard the album

ToSmokMuzyki
March 15th 2026


15433 Comments


10 out of 16 is pretty gud tho

NudeTayne
March 15th 2026


2794 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

it really is, my TAS review has a worse ratio and I worked real hard on that one

ToSmokMuzyki
March 15th 2026


15433 Comments


still not as bad as my symbolic review goml goml goml ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

LouBreed
March 16th 2026


430 Comments


This review is just as valid and well-articulated as the one written by Hawks. People demanding to delete it just because it's negative and because "there's already a staff review" are crybabies.

Christbait
March 16th 2026


1710 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It ain't a 4.7, but it sure isn't a 2.0 either



The review is fine; calls for it to be deleted "because of reasons" are pathetic though. Especially coming from staff. Y'all are better than that regardless of whatever intent you think OP has. I appreciate the perspective, but my main criticism is that the review does not read as a 2.0.



Hawks
Staff Reviewer
March 16th 2026


121527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

Who is the staff member that called for it to be deleted? I don't agree with the review, but its certainly not terrible.

LouBreed
March 16th 2026


430 Comments


@Hawks, I'm not saying that a staff member called for deletion, I'm saying that there's a dude demanding for this review to be deleted because "there is already a staff review" (see comment No.4)

ShartHarder
Contributing Reviewer
March 16th 2026


639 Comments



It ain't a 4.7, but it sure isn't a 2.0 either

agree

Christbait
March 16th 2026


1710 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I re-read and it was just you replying to Smok, Hawks. Sometimes if I'm not looking at context, I assume the replies are targeted at the author. I'm sorry for the mix up. Thought you were calling the reviewer the biggest idiot on the site. I stand corrected!

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
March 16th 2026


121527 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

All good bro lol.

MO
March 16th 2026


24276 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"Listening to this at the moment, solid album albeit nothing particularly groundbreaking."



this

NudeTayne
March 16th 2026


2794 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It ain't a 4.7, but it sure isn't a 2.0 either



[2]

PizzaBear
March 16th 2026


890 Comments


Yeah this is heading towards 3.5 territory which still makes it probably their best since wrath

ToSmokMuzyki
March 16th 2026


15433 Comments


lmao who deleted my comment

ToSmokMuzyki
March 16th 2026


15433 Comments


it is bc i said b****? ok, staff shouldnt be having hissy fits bc someone prefers another review



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy