Album Rating: 4.0
I definitely think this fits in the category of something I appreciate exists more than actual enjoyment from listening to it but this album is virtually objectively better than just 'average'.
|
| |
"objectively better than just 'average"
I reluctantly agree. But I also don't think it is possible to know what average music is.
|
| |
If you can remember what average music sounds like you're paying it too much attention :]
|
| |
"Objectively average" would be a strange, bad take on most albums
|
| |
"Objectively average" is the old school version of "aggressively ok" lmao
|
| |
See, I get why to some people those 2 phrases would mean the same thing, but imo they really reeeeaally don't
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
one of those albums that makes you want to bask in the neon embrace
|
| |
In terms of what they actually mean, sure. In terms of being uncreative but easily usable ways to write something off tho...
|
| |
Yeah tbh the more I think about it "aggressively ok" is also pretty garbo as a descriptor, just for different reasons
|
| |
Yeah, it's pretty pushy but kinda lame unless you back it up big time
|
| |
Imagining an album being unremarkably competent to the point where I feel actively aggressed by it. Aaagghh oww oh nooo it's bullying me with how fine it is
|
| |
RIP Kompys2000-2020, killed by okayness
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
the clipping at the end of this review reminds me of code orange.
|
| |
this sparks joy
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
So would you consider this album a 2.5 or a 3.0?
|
| |
a pretty modest 3.0 I think. I don't care much for this one way or another, but no fun shitposts were ever written about 3.0s
|
| |
So it's ""good"" but you don't care about it?
|
| |
it's "just about good" and I do not care about it :]
|
| |
I've listened to this like a dozen times and I still have no idea what I would rate it
|
| |
What's worse than just about good?
|
| |
|
|