OK to clear things up, its not a 1.5 but I can see where your coming from. but it seems you have listened to this cd already with the view of not liking it from what you have written and that you have written it just to make a point that you hate metallica. I have to say surley you must have better things to do.

I would also like to ask what would you suggest in preference to listen to instead of this as you don't like it, which I think is a good point to mention in a review like this.

Cheers

Album Rating: 4.5

Says the Avenged Sevenfold fanboy.

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I dont agree with the review. This album IMO is pure gold and my favourite Metallica album. But it was a well written review, nice one.

Album Rating: 3.5

this album is pretty good and great review.

Album Rating: 3.5

Holy crap. My 2/5 Nevermind review didn't get bashed this much to make Damrod bring down ye olde ban hammer.



Edit: Also, good review and backed yourself up even though "it's Metallica" shouldn't be one of the negative things.This Message Edited On 06.15.06This Message Edited On 06.15.06

Album Rating: 5.0

This has to be the most controversial review ever written. I love it.

Album Rating: 2.0

Well it was great that Metallica was one of the negitve things, quite humorous.

You did what no one else on this site did, rate this album a 1.5 and backed yourself up. Great job.

Album Rating: 2.0

Holy Doublepost!!!!!!This Message Edited On 06.15.06

Album Rating: 4.0

eh, this album is great. I'm not a big metalhead so this is "good enough" for me. Sweet riffs, great melodies, strong production, and awesome face-melting solos.

great review, very well argued, even though y'all just a bunch of haterz.

1.5? plus Metallica? plus Master Of Puppets? @_@

I've never cared for them, so I wouldn't know, but this still shocks me compared to all the praise this album gets.

Album Rating: 4.5

Holy cow a 1.5 on Metallica, it wouldnt be such a surprise if this rating was on St. Anger or Load but MoP??wow....Good review altough i disagree on everything you typed.

Album Rating: 5.0

I think you may have tried to hype it even more with the whole "This album is considered by many to be the classic album of the 1900's." Your review is based solely upon your opinions of James's voice and Cliff Burton, Kirk Hammett, and Lars Ulrich's ability to play their instruments. Sure it's not groundbreaking BECAUSE IT WAS MADE IN 1986! I know I'm probably going to be called a fanboy for this comment but I don't really care. Before my 8th grade year all I listened to was Rap, Hip-hop, and R&B. My friend sat me down and let me listen to Sad But True off of their self-titled album and since then I have loved Metallica. Without Metallica I can say that I'd be a truly different person. Haha. I guess I'll leave with: this review sucked, I can see you trying to review the negatives of a great album, but next time try to do so without getting your biased opinions into it.This Message Edited On 06.15.06This Message Edited On 06.15.06

Album Rating: 2.0

You cant deny that he backed his opinion up in an intellegent matter though.

All because it dont clash your opinion on the album, dont make the review suck, thats what opinions are for.

But "its metallica" shouldn't be in the con list( nor should it be in the pro list, in fact he shouldn't even say that at all).

Very ballsy review. What I've heard from MoP I'd rate a lot higher than a 1.5, but your review backed up your points well. Nice job.
Too bad it's impossible not to get negged to hell for doing a negative review on a popular album...

Album Rating: 5.0

I got to hand it to you, it took some balls to do this. Although, I didn't like review at all. And I entirely disagree with everything you said.

Album Rating: 4.5

This was a pretty good review. But I would just like to say something. Please note, this is not directed at Drunken Viking in particular.

Right now, it seems that someone can come out hating an album with barely any backing facts and get pozzed to infinity. It seems that us sputnik users are concentrating more on the "balls" it takes to write a review than the actual content.

Your review is better than most negative reviews, Drunken Viking, and I gave you my vote. Again, this doesn't concern you very much at all.

Album Rating: 3.5

[quote=]I think you may have tried to hype it even more with the whole "This album is considered by many to be the classic album of the 1900's." Your review is based solely upon your opinions of James's voice and Cliff Burton, Kirk Hammett, and Lars Ulrich's ability to play their instruments. Sure it's not groundbreaking BECAUSE IT WAS MADE IN 1986! I know I'm probably going to be called a fanboy for this comment but I don't really care. Before my 8th grade year all I listened to was Rap, Hip-hop, and R&B. My friend sat me down and let me listen to Sad But True off of their self-titled album and since then I have loved Metallica. Without Metallica I can say that I'd be a truly different person. Haha. I guess I'll leave with: this review sucked, I can see you trying to review the negatives of a great album, but next time try to do so without getting your biased opinions into it.[/quote]I'm sorry to break up your speech, but the way you say his review is bad that's also your opinion as much as what he said of the review. In the way you choose to think you're contradicting yourself. People have different opinions and just because someone thinks differently than you do doesn't mean they're wrong at all. To say that someone is wrong about something in that way is completely ignorant and disrespectful to the writer. His review defended what he thought of the album in a good way and your comment soils upon his greak work.

I must say I respect you as a reviewer for giving this album what you did. I do not like Metallica, but I've not heard enough of any of their albums to rate em.

Just to make the point, please refrain from shi[FONT=Verdana]t[/FONT]ing this review up. It shouldn't need to be said, but the reviewer is quite entitled to his opinion (subjectivity in music and all that), and disagreeing with him is fine. Getting involved in grammatically inept flamefests that go on for pages isn't. We've already had to ban several people and delete several pages from the review, and I'd rather not have to carry on.