John Frusciante Outsides
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


what's up foxxxy? [2]

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
August 29th 2013


16952 Comments


what's up foxxxy? [3]

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


damn foxxxy [4]

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
August 29th 2013


16952 Comments


i like that youre reviewing more ~swooooooon~

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


thank you my friend :]

ButteryBiscuitBass
August 29th 2013


11469 Comments


You've got no friends.

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


hey hey hey

reported

menawati
August 29th 2013


16749 Comments


nice review mate, pos

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


thanks martin dude good to see you around the place

Mongi123
August 29th 2013


22443 Comments


Great review dude pos. May try listening to this or that other album you mentioned.

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


don't listen to this first lol

if you wanna check some frusciante start with shadows and/or curtains

Mongi123
August 29th 2013


22443 Comments


Will do bro

ViperAces
August 29th 2013


12609 Comments


woah a tommy rev

Yuli
Emeritus
August 29th 2013


10767 Comments


I feel like I have seen offshoots of that first sentence a dozen times on this site (probably from me as well)

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


in what way? lessons learned from the previous record?

i was basically trying to recap in the most concise way possible and that's the best thing that came to me after a bottle of wine

i'm open to suggestions though man

Yuli
Emeritus
August 29th 2013


10767 Comments


I was actually pointing out that particular sentence's structure. "If (artist)'s (previous record) taught us anything, it was that (artist) ___."

Just funny, because I am pretty sure I have used those exact words in some review as well. It's a good format, and a good way to interpret an artist's music-- I guess it just becomes problematic when I notice it more and more.

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


yeah fair call, i feel it's warranted in this particular case as the last record was something of a radical departure from everything that came before it, therefore it's quite relevant to that whole opening paragraph

i don't think i've seen it that often elsewhere but then again i don't read that many reviews...

i'll have a think about different ways to word it though, thanks for the input mate, much appreciated

Yuli
Emeritus
August 29th 2013


10767 Comments


It isn't a big deal, don't get me wrong. It's just interesting that it's stood out to me so many times around these parts.

tommygun
August 29th 2013


27148 Comments


yeah man no doubt there are definitely certain patterns you see repeated in a lot of writing here

i dunno how you keep pumpin out reviews so regularly dude, mad respect

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
August 29th 2013


16952 Comments


dolin out the props



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy