Swans The Seer
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
bodiesinflight57
November 13th 2012


870 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

It's Swans being more Swans than they ever have been before. If everyone liked it then it would be totally pointless. It's obviously the sort of music that is going to cause differences of opinion.



Well written review, totally disagree, but can understand completely where you are coming from.

clercqie
November 13th 2012


6525 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Still one of my favorites from this year.

NoMeansYes
November 13th 2012


1012 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

pos'd

boogs
November 13th 2012


232 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Finally someone tells it like it is.

DarkNoctus
November 13th 2012


12817 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

yeah this has been overhyped to a frankly annoying degree



it's bloated as all hell

pedro70512
November 13th 2012


4170 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

thanks for the positive comments. I was pretty sure I was in for a Sputwhipping but I'm glad people agree. maybe it's a grower but I'm not feeling it.

menawati
November 13th 2012


16750 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

you just don't 'get' it man, none of us who aren't a 5 'get' it

Havey
November 13th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

disagreed but you really backed yourself up so pos'd

pedro70512
November 13th 2012


4170 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah I missed the Swans initiation ceremony. they wouldn't let me in without my Elitist Hat, some fat chick stole it at the Opeth concert earlier this year.

AStableReference
November 13th 2012


2202 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

you just don't 'get' it man, none of us who aren't a 5 'get' it




Isn't that what everyone says when somebody doesn't like something they like?

tarkus
November 13th 2012


5569 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

thats why he was pointing out the stupidity of the statement

GiaNXGX
November 14th 2012


5744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0



Learn how to opinion.





Learn how to read in the first place - What post-punk bands do you listen to?

tarkus
November 14th 2012


5569 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this album isnt even fucking post punk

Uranium
November 14th 2012


7549 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

album rules

tarkus
November 14th 2012


5569 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

clever

Havey
November 14th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

!

AStableReference
November 14th 2012


2202 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I don't care to convert anyone, there's just stuff some people won't like. I can only say why I like it. In case you haven't noticed the higher raters in these comments don't really care.



14 of 14 thought this review was well written


GiaNXGX
November 14th 2012


5744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

orgasms...

AStableReference
November 14th 2012


2202 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Multiple orgasms

GiaNXGX
November 14th 2012


5744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

hahahaha yeah I think I remember that one. Used to rent jarassic park movies and watch them on the weekend back in 2008.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy