Mumford and Sons Babel
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Aids
November 20th 2012


24937 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

that's a mistake for a couple of reasons



a. taking sputnik average ratings seriously is lol

b. the tower of ones would not exist (did not exist for the debut previous to Knott losing his marbles) without the influence of a few staff members that really hate this band

c. idk it's just really stupid, think for yourself.



it's a decent album at best, but there are good songs and enjoyable moments on it.

DrMaximus
November 20th 2012


12896 Comments


Good point, Aids. I've never been into Mumford anyways.

Cygnatti
November 21st 2012


36394 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

meh

NightmareCinema16
November 27th 2012


2016 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

So glad that I can Sigh no more. It's all over.

ShadowRemains
December 28th 2012


28670 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

still don't really get why knott hates this band





cuz this band is fucking annoying surprise

controlled
December 28th 2012


660 Comments


what's annoying surprise?

ITsHxCTOASTER
December 28th 2012


2520 Comments


I hate this band with a fiery passion and I don't think my 5 section is too Sputnik aside from the
GY!BE and Kanye, although I feel like everyone that originally 5'd MBDTF dropped their rating. Anyway,
all of that aside, this band blows

Hoppip
December 28th 2012


139 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

uh-huh

chambered99
January 10th 2013


889 Comments


Mumford & Sons - did release that collection of songs, and he realised that creating a piece of art based on hollow attempts to reconstruct the shallowest tenets of something which is in fact quite elegant, is really not the way to communicate with people at all.



nails it

AutoRock
February 15th 2013


422 Comments


hipsters dont like this band cause they dug them for a little bit then they got too popular.

thank u big hans for saying everything that needs to be said.

tommygun
February 15th 2013


27148 Comments


maybe the band just sucks

Aids
February 15th 2013


24937 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

ummmmm this is the best album of the year the grammys said so



so obviously they dont suck get real

tommygun
February 15th 2013


27148 Comments


my mistake

carry on

BigPleb
February 15th 2013


65808 Comments


Faux folk

YankeeDudel
February 15th 2013


9342 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

band isnt really that bad. they're a 2.5-3 band. they're just way too overplayed and yea thats a hipster no no.

dimsim3478
February 15th 2013


8987 Comments


OH THIS FUCKING BAND

Cygnatti
February 15th 2013


36394 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"hipsters dont like this band cause they dug them for a little bit then they got too popular."



actually no, I don't tend to like folk music in general

ButteryBiscuitBass
February 15th 2013


11469 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

So gay.

Cygnatti
September 22nd 2013


36394 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Band is breaking up.

Friday13th
September 22nd 2013


7624 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I was at their KC concert last night. They said they'd be taking a break but not breaking up. Anyways, my family likes them haha



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy