Mumford and Sons Babel
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
someguest
September 26th 2012


30126 Comments


Lol @ "Sigh some more".

TMobotron
September 26th 2012


7253 Comments


"who gives a shit what their fans think?"

Like I said, I can separate my annoyance from my opinion of the album (and I liked their first one). I think it's dumb when people let shit like that affect how they listen to something. But that's just it: it's annoying. Claims like the band "making indie relevant again." being spouted off to tons of willing listeners just breeds ignorance.

But that's obviously not Mumford's fault, they're just putting out fun folk songs and I hope they keep doing so.

Atari
Staff Reviewer
September 26th 2012


27975 Comments


dumbass.

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

"...and then I'll get around to giving this the treatment it deserves."



yesssssssssssss

Steoandnoodles
September 26th 2012


2832 Comments


As much as I liked this review; Adam's review will be hilarious.

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

yeah i can't wait to get into a tl;dr raging argument with him that lasts several pages of comments. gonna be m/

Steoandnoodles
September 26th 2012


2832 Comments


Finally sitting down to listen to this. Love this first track 'Babel'. Maybe because it reminds me of 'Battery Kinzie' (for some reason) but it's pretty good. =)

I think I'm preferring this album to their debut but I'm still not mad on it yet.

Gyromania
September 26th 2012


37166 Comments


TMobotron: agreed on all counts.

Aids: i wouldn't bother. as much as i'm accepting of different opinions, i really think i'll have a hard time accepting an argument for a 1/5. at worst i think this just fades into the background.

Steoandnoodles
September 26th 2012


2832 Comments


The sound really becomes stagnated four tracks in for me. =/

I don't know why but I feel the banjo is so abused in their music. I don't mean that in a nasty way. I get they have a banjo player and all but man it becomes so grating the way they use it in my opinion. =(

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

gyro - i was half joking. i won't seek it out but i converse enough with adam that eventually we will get into a shouting match about it. i know that for sure.

Sowing
Moderator
September 26th 2012


43976 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah they use three banjo way too much

Steoandnoodles
September 26th 2012


2832 Comments


I get they sort of have to having a banjo player and all but at least write him more original parts
than either.

1. Playing the banjo fast.
2. Carrying the melody with a downward strum.

Seriously. =/ I mean, c'mon! He's the Michael Cera of banjo players type cast into the same roles. (no
offence to Cera. I find him quite funny.)

I'd love to hear M&S do something more subtle.

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

"He's the Michael Cera of banjo players type cast into the same roles. (no

offence to Cera. I find him quite funny.)"



123. the banjo parts get kind of old, really really fast.



anyway, i'm on the fourth track and enjoying this as much as i expected to. it's got all the things

that made people hate Sigh No More though, and they're even more pronounced on this album. i think

this'll get much more hate.



anyway, I'll probably end up giving this a 3.

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

also this will get nominated for and possibly win the grammy for album of the year

Crymsonblaze
September 26th 2012


8232 Comments


What an annoying band.

JohnnyoftheWell
Staff Reviewer
September 26th 2012


60671 Comments


If you had any idea the number of semi-clever headlines I had queued for this – my favorites being “they really fucked it up this time” and “sigh some more” – then you’d appreciate that I actually feel a small sense of remorse for enjoying Babel to the extent that I do

Haha, I lol'd

Steoandnoodles
September 26th 2012


2832 Comments


Yeah, I know. It's not for me. I loved the first track and surely with each one; they start to blend together for me. Ironically, I think 'Reminder' is one of the most forgettable tracks in history. =P

hyllengren
September 26th 2012


23 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Great review! Haven't listend to it yet, but I'm projection somewhere from 2.5-3.5, we'll see

Aids
September 26th 2012


24512 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

yeah it's somewhere between a 2.5 and 3 for me. i'm gonna give it a 3 because i think that subconsiously all this bullshit about them "ruining music and shitting on their influences" blah blah is making me like it less. the album is really samey and lacks powerful standout tracks like Sigh No More had, but I'll probably give it a few more spins before i never listen to it again so who knows maybe i'll find some.

hyllengren
September 26th 2012


23 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Sigh no more was good but lacking originality and it wasn't really interesting.

This was pretty good to, but extremely uninteresting. None of the catchy tunes that sigh no more had plenty of



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy