Yeah I see what you mean. To me it sounded a bit gimmicky, but enjoyable nonetheless.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Their an odd band. I wouldn't know exactly where to place them. Not super heavy. So not really metal, but at the same time they are. You know? -_-
|
| |
Don't see how you could say this is "not really metal" at all. It's quite clearly clearly metal.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Loved this. Also, great review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I don't know if anyone has stated this or not, but in the review you say "painfully short 31 minute length" -- [id] was ~29 minutes and was considered a full-length release. Maybe I'm missing the point, but this is fuckingphenomenal.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
first, he said regretfully short, and length doesn't matter too much or grindcore bands would only have ep's
|
| |
woah, i was surprised seeing this here. i went to school with Ryan B the guitarist and saw his old band play a ton of times. Also, went over to his house once and he was either recording this, or at least demoing it. definitely gonna have to give a solid listen soon
|
| |
periphery rip off
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
not quite, but this release is not nearly as amazing as some people are making it out to be, they have some improvements to make
|
| |
im so frustrated. im looking for some technical as fuck metalcore type stuff and cant find anything i don't hate or haven't already heard.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
like sweeps and junz? try red seas fire, better periphery rip off then these guys are. their cleans are similar to these but a little gayer, however their riffs are stellar
|
| |
this band is not good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
but they are
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
their actually a really talented band, but this album is getting a lot more praise then it deserves. There's a lot of potential to do something truly excellent with these guys but they made a lot of silly silly mistakes on this album which held it back from being better than it could have been. overrated
|
| |
but they arent
not good =/= not talented.
singer's obnoxious
music is way too wanky and selfabsorbed
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
nothing wrong with a little wank, thats not the problem most of the time. And the singer's melodies are out of place and don't carry the songs.......his vocals are always in the wrong place at the wrong time. But idk for me I really like a lot of the riffs on here, and its a very varied album for the genre. overrated though, solid 3.5 no way its a 4.5 or 5.
|
| |
its not just a little wank its like fuckloads of wank
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
lol come on dude you have colors 5'd and 3 dt albums at 5, are you really in a position to be criticizing wank in any way lol
|
| |
colors is pretty great and i've kind of grown out of DT tbh, i'm just way too lazy to go through and change my ratings.
|
| |
nevertheless, you like wank
I like wank
we all like wank
|
| |
|
|
