Album Rating: 2.5
obviously you guys don't even read the review because i changed it when the issue was first brought to my attention
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
We just want a review we can take seriously. We know you reviewed an incomplete album, and that you barely changed anything in the review when you were caught. I have no problem with the low score, it's an opinion, I just don't like that you reviewed an incomplete product.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Review is fine
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
yeah, i barely changed the review because it was a minute and a half that i missed. a minute and a half of a song isn't
going to change my opinion of the album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
its like all the band members made accounts here just to bash the review or something
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
C'mon, what did you expect? You gave a popular band a bad review, you had to know that the fanboys would be upset. You just made it easier to dismiss your review because of the mistake you made. It just seems like you barely listened to the album before you wrote the review.
|
| |
is it because it really reads like that?
or more so the fact that you do not agree with the rating?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
don't worry then i listened to the album plenty
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
It just doesn't read like the reviewer listened to the album much before writing the review. He thought You Wanna Freak Out was supposed to cut out like that. Really? Doesn't that seem like a sign that the review was rushed? It is just hard to believe he would think that if he had listened to the album more than once before writing the review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
You know he could've just listened to the full song on youtube or something.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
ive listened to the full song, it doesn't change my opinion
|
| |
just because 90 seconds were missing from the end of the song does not dictate the review was rushed.
in any way whatsoever.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
It may not mean that it was rushed, but that the reviewer did not listen to the album thoroughly BEFORE writing the review. I am not trying to change the reviewer's opinion or rating, just expressing my thoughts on the review.
|
| |
yeah I mean 98% of the record intact completely derails any chance of some thorough listens.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
It was strange that he didn't realize that the song was incomplete, which to me implies that he did not listen thoroughly. Most people who listened to the leaked version more than once noticed that the rest of the song was missing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I assumed they ended the song that way. Many other bands have songs that cut off at weird moments.
|
| |
It was strange that he didn't realize that the song was incomplete, which to me implies that he did not listen thoroughly. Most people who listened to the leaked version more than once noticed that the rest of the song was missing.
that argument holds about as much solid ground as a twig does the weight of an elephant.
could have just as easily been a production tweak and intentional.
|
| |
bad indie
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Could have, but it doesn't seem as likely for that to be the case. It was a leak, the song cut off early and abrubtly, so the most reasonable thought would be that the leaked copy wasn't legit.
|
| |
ummmm...sure?
|
| |
|
|
