Album Rating: 2.0
Well you claiming that i lack intelligence is sort of negated by your rating this a 4.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Actually, not in the slightest. And that being your only point, coupled with your lame attempts to continually ride the oh so old "you're not a girl" bandwagon only reinforce the undeniable fact that there wasn't any lifeguard keeping watch over the gene pool when you emerged from it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
oh good one.
|
| |
come on WhereIsMyMind if your only comeback is "oh good one" it probably means that you're getting killed here, just retreat
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Nah not really, i just love how she thinks that the sex pistols are a good band.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
What happened to calling me a troll?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
you probably are. but i have no way of proving it. i honestly have nothing against you at all dear, its just that i find it amusing that everytime a (supposed) female shows up on sputnik, the collective community flips their shit. if you are actually a girl then please forgive me.
i still think your rating is way to generous though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Well you claiming that i lack intelligence is sort of negated by your rating this a 4.
you of all people have ABSOLUTELY no room to talk. A 4.5 for Syncope Threshold and a 3.5 for Attack Attack! is utter bullshit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"you probably are. but i have no way of proving it. i honestly have nothing against you at all dear, its just that i find it amusing that everytime a (supposed) female shows up on sputnik, the collective community flips their shit. if you are actually a girl then please forgive me."
Well, let's see. I know someone off this site, whom i've also met. Plus i've been facebook searched so it has been proven. Secondly, don't ever call me dear again. And as for anyone flipping their shit out, you're the only one in this thread who's bothered to mention it. Funny that, don't ya think?
But nice defensive, retreating suits you.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Nah, look at your shoutbox and the amount of comments on your two lists. Thats cause youre a girl.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
That wasn't a dig at ya by the way Palace lol.
Whereisyourmind: No, it's because people respond well to normal conversations. There's plenty of lists around with more comments than mine.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
i dont really like attack attack anymore, im just too lazy to rewrite my review.
and go ahead and say what you will about btbam, theyre better than this shit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
mostly cry
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
oh also, if you actually read my review, you'll see that I in no way called them the pioneers of progressive metal, just that some people believe that.
are they one of the reigning forces in contemporary prog metal? certainly, right up there with dark tranquility, maudlin, and dream theater, for better or for worse.
but yeah mostly cry, its what i do.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
and uhm, yes my argument against this album is that it's sloppy, poorly produced, and the musicianship is laughable, which is kind of sad considering that they didnt even play their own instruments. and most of this record's success was based on their IMAGE. this group is essentially a poorly assembled project consisting of rich white kids who they dressed up as "nonconformists" and utilized them as a social experiment. even if this band had any talent, theyre completely full of shit as a whole, completely and totally fake punk.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Taylor's got it in one. This is punk, original punk. It's not supposed to be spit shine perfect on the production, that's the whole appeal of it.
You mention "rich white kids", three of the members (i'll give you names if you want) were working class teenagers struggling to make end's meat while working in a band called The Strand. The first time they met Johnny he was wearing a t shirt held together by safety pins, and that wasn't a fashion statement either.
Don't comment on things you have absolutely no idea about, it really makes you look quite the fool.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
All in all this album is pretty lolworthy, absolutely no musicianship on display here, and please dont say its because its "punk," thats no excuse for having a bassist that doesnt know how to play in the slightest.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i haven't heard that arguement before.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Well considering its a pretty widely used argument against this album... but hey, sexy Raekwon rating, man's a genius.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
theres sooooooooo much better classic punk out there than this its not even funny
|
| |
|
|