Album Rating: 1.0
I thought James was behind most of those lyrics. Either way, they are better than this piece of crap's lyrics.
|
| |
Oh god, this is fucking awful.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
So giving him oral will drive you to insanity?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
Indeed it is. I would hate it more than St. Anger if the songs here were also dragged on to ridiculous length by using very few riffs.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
I dunno, this might be worse than St Anger.
|
| |
Both have trash can snare but this has worse vocals easily.
|
| |
I don't even hate St Anger but I might find Requim to be worse than this. By a little.
|
| |
Hmm...Destroyer of Worlds?
|
| |
Certain tracks, like "Lake of Fire" are among Bathory's best IMO. It has some bad tracks tho, but it is overall forgettable. It feels like it was recorded on two seperate studio visits; one with a thrashy intention and the next with a slow Viking metal vibe.
|
| |
"a bored Anders Fridén trying to kill death metal even more"
just rofl
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
I like a lot of the Viking tracks on Destroyer of Worlds, but the terrible thrash tracks murder its consistency.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
Destroyer Of Worlds is better than Requiem though
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
[2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Requiem is worse. I find this pretty tolerable.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
requiem has the advantage that it's actually listenable
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Requiem is awful. Production makes it barely listenable although the bass is nice. I don't mind the production here, but it's bland.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
What the actual fuck is this?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
The drumming is great, some of the solos are pretty good, and the guitar tone and some riffs are pretty good here, but it's inconsistent as fuck. That being said, a 1.6 average seems a bit low.
|
| |
All the 1s are pretty harsh. I mean it's bad but it's not 1 worthy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
did i just hear "eat my shit, suck my dick"?
|
| |
|
|