Into Eternity The Incurable Tragedy
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Lunarcheese
September 2nd 2008


33 Comments


Well Altmer, from the looks of it your appeal hasn't gone through; You're still here.

Into Eternity is nowhere near as bad as St.Anger, I dont even know how you can say that. They are hardly even the same genre of music. Just because you don't like them, doesn't mean they suck.

Lunarcheese
September 2nd 2008


33 Comments


Nevermind, you listen to Snow Patrol and Katy Perry, I understand. I'm sorry I made fun of you, I didn't know your condition.

Zoo
September 3rd 2008


3759 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I think it's about time you tuck your fanboy back in your pants.

Erratic
September 3rd 2008


1120 Comments


Nevermind, you listen to Snow Patrol and Katy Perry, I understand. I'm sorry I made fun of you, I didn't know your condition.


It's funny how far down you have to scroll in his ratings to get those two. You must've been looking pretty hard.

Pluh
September 3rd 2008


579 Comments


When you click on his name, those are 2 of the 4 bands in his bands that he's "currently digging."

Not to nit pick, but they were.

AngelPhoenix
September 3rd 2008


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I think it's about time you tuck your fanboy back in your pants


lmao

ZY6 bustin out the big guns

Doppelganger
September 3rd 2008


3124 Comments


General consensus on the site says this album blows. I have to agree.

fireaboveicebelow
September 3rd 2008


6835 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

especially Dream Theater...



I mean COME ON

Yazz_Flute
September 3rd 2008


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

fuck you guys DT is awesome

Aeksis8745
September 3rd 2008


450 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

After another full listen of the album I still don't understand such a low rating. Its basically SoA part II, which isn't that bad of a critique. I'm probably going to lower the rating for this but only to a 3. These guys are just too solid.

IsItLuck?
Emeritus
September 3rd 2008


4957 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"Its basically SoA part II, which isn't that bad of a critique."



That's one of the worst critiques a band can get. That shows they didn't progress from that album and played it safe. Regardless I stick by my rating and opinion. This album is simply bad

Aeksis8745
September 3rd 2008


450 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I think its forgivable if they only do it for this album. Anything beyond that is pushing it. There are a lot of albums that didn't progress that much from the album before, and some are considered classics. Iron maiden's Powerslave, Children of Bodom's Follow the Reaper, and Metallica's Master of Puppets to name a few, not bad albums to say the least.

Lunarcheese
September 4th 2008


33 Comments


Yeah, Erratic, I didn't have to scroll at all. Apparently the obvious just eludes you a bit too easily, big guy.

Yeah I'm actually not an Into Eternity fanboy. I don't own any of their albums and I only listen to them in my friend's car, but I can tell they're talented and their music is good. It's hard for me to take the mad beaks you're laying out, ZooYorker.

I'm actually not trying to make a bad first impression on this site. I'm just amazed by the amount of hostility I'm getting for disagreeing with this guy's review. Seriously, suck it up. People will disagree with you, you needn't be assholes about it.

But no, this album isn't a 1.5 in my books. not at all. And Dream Theater are far from boring.

TeamExcelcior
September 4th 2008


244 Comments


I giggled at your Akerfeldt comment. I'm having a hard time believing this band can release anything straight up bad though. I'm still going to check this out but with caution.

Thor
September 4th 2008


10357 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

The music is pretty standard Into Eternity, and none of it is particularly memorable. Plus Stu Block started to suck, A LOT.

Hawks
September 4th 2008


92895 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I still think Stu Block is amazing.

ChaosTheory
September 9th 2008


102 Comments


I haven't bothered with this band since BiO. Good review, and i agree with your point about the vocals. They really are pretty awful.

Bleak123
September 9th 2008


1900 Comments


Yeah, I've always hated this bands vocals, they may be pretty original to an extent within the genre, but it doesn't stop them being pretty damn bad.

ChaosTheory
September 9th 2008


102 Comments


^ 123.

Nightsbane
September 10th 2008


15 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I really don't understand the criticism of Stu's vocals. He has incredible range, plus he hits the notes clearly without any of the annoying nuances of his contemporaries. And his growls are much improved. I saw the group live twice and Stu put on a hell of a show.



Yeah, album is mediocre, but a 1.5? There are still a couple of songs that are note-worthy on this.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy