: (
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I'm not anywhere near being a big fan of this guy, but I enjoyed To Emma.
How do you get from there to here
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
might grow to a 4. first half destroys second half except circles and the closer
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Wow, the second half literally does feel like a breeze just exiting my window.
First half was obnoxious electronic shit.
Painfully average :c
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
six six six t is good
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I love all the textures on this one. But the distorted chewing sound on deathbreast is annoying af
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
why da 5
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Because I can ignore it once those godlike falsettos come in
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
The electronics are far from innovative for me. Just come across as obnoxious and intrusive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
This was really solid, despite the goddamn chipmunk vocals
|
| |
I will never be able to unsee the chipmunks. tuuuu- tuuuu-
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Has anyone seen the NPR Front Row video? It's fantastic.
|
| |
Just watched it Blush. The whole thing was really good. New songs are easier to digest on this performance and old songs' renditions were pretty nice too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I agree. In fact, I'm sorta liking the new ones I lot more than when I was listening to this album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah this NPR thingy is wonderful, thanks for the tip off
|
| |
jesus "radiohead of modern folk" is a lazy analogy
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
it's not a lazy analogy if it's the comparison I meant to make
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I wouldn't even call this folk
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
It's not really
Other than the few tracks here where he pretty much reverts to the formula of BI, BI
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Usually I find auto-tune stuff to be tasteless, but there's some nifty vibes going on here.
|
| |
|
|