Ne Obliviscaris Citadel
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
SgtShock
November 17th 2014


948 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

^ Easily one of my favorite outros of all time.

pedro70512
November 18th 2014


4170 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Sevengill summed it up pretty well in her (I think) review. It's probably my favorite Isis song, actually. Maybe behind Carry or Red Sea.

musiceasethepain
November 18th 2014


27 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Why does it have 300 votes in the allgenres chart, but 900 votes in the metal chart?!

FrozenVain
November 18th 2014


3043 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

sputnik bug it happens for all album

musiceasethepain
November 18th 2014


27 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

which is the right one?

pedro70512
November 18th 2014


4170 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

obviously the metal chart is from the future

derpentine
November 18th 2014


14 Comments


lol @ all the hipster kids who apparently care very much about letting everyone know how much they disagree
with all the mainstream fags voting along the average.

inb4 "I dont really care that much" while repeatedly posting into the thread for the album

godbuster
November 18th 2014


43 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

They actually sound like Beyond Creation on this record. Plus you can easily notice that classical violins has been overused. And that can be boring point a bit.

SpiritCrusher2
November 18th 2014


6531 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

overused violins [123] take the first few minutes of Pyrrhic for example, just a coupleof generic melodeath riffs and meaningless violin solos. then after almost 4 minutes there's that cool melodic riff, but transition to it is so awkward. actually the transition out of it is too, whole riff seems really out of place. looks like they're using violins to cover up their not-so-good songwriting skills and just prolong the songs and make them seem more progressive when they really aren't.

I still really like Blackholes though, and they can surely write some good riffs. violins are great too (that intro track is fabulous), but they'd be a lot more effective if they weren't used so often

Mythodea
November 18th 2014


7459 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Bookends are beyond words for me. I love that twisted sound, that trembling, agonizing vibe. Even people that would otherwise ignore or even find the album to be avoidable, accpet that it's really well done. The third part of Painters of the Tempest is even more melodic and dark, so I'd give it a 5 as a song, or at least a 4.5. Now, PotT pt.II and Colossus Pt. II are both a 4.3 for me in general, a 4.5 at parts. Pyrrhic is a 4 or even a 3.8. So, generally, a 4.5 describes best my ranking...

climactic
November 18th 2014


22923 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"Now, PotT pt.II and Colossus Pt. II are both a 4.3 for me in general, a 4.5 at parts. Pyrrhic is a 4 or even a 3.8."



lol jesus

Mythodea
November 18th 2014


7459 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lol, buddha

Serenityinaz12
November 19th 2014


134 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I've never listened to this band before, but about halfway through I can see why it's so popular here, similar to Opeth in a way. Not my cup of tea at all, a bit what I would consider radio friendly / mainstream metal in style and sound. Cheers to all who dig this sort of stuff though. On a side-note, the black metal tag really should be taken off this band imo, unless their old content fits the bill. This sure does not.

musiceasethepain
November 19th 2014


27 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Pyrrhic is the only track with a black metal vibe, similar to xenoflux. Definetely Portal of I

was pretty much black metal .

pedro70512
November 19th 2014


4170 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Pyrrhic's second half is gorgeous.

godbuster
November 19th 2014


43 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

@SpiritCrusher2, totally agreed.

Serenityinaz12
November 19th 2014


134 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Maybe I would enjoy Portal of I better then if it's more Black metalish - will give it a try.

Serenityinaz12
November 19th 2014


134 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I've listened to most of Portal of I and there is nothing black metal about this either lol. Not saying that's bad, it is what it is, but there shouldn't be a "black metal" tag associated with this band IMO. If anything trade it for power metal label or something with all the clean vocals

tempest--
November 19th 2014


20634 Comments


lol what
clean vocals = power metal, got it

band is prog/dm, simple. influences of bm but agreed they shouldn't be labelled bm.

Serenityinaz12
November 19th 2014


134 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

meh, of course they aren't typical power metal but if there is going to be a 3rd tag on it I would still say make it power instead of BM. Clean vocals don't equal power metal but it is a big component. But yes, overall, I would say just prog/dm is what it should be.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy