Metallica ...And Justice For All
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
idontcareaboutthis
July 18th 2015


952 Comments


okay that i can see. but no way would i call metallica progressive in any sense of the word

MrSirLordGentleman
July 18th 2015


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Then let's call it prog metal instead of "prog" (which is often used to refer to progressive rock), they're too different





You don't say punk when you want to refer to post punk

Ocean of Noise
July 18th 2015


11368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

there's a ton of progressive elements on this album. check out the time signature changes on the title track, or the through-composed structure of One, or the metric modulation in Eye of the Beholder.



there's lots of weird shit on here that a standard thrash metal band wouldn't even dare think of imo. but it is borderline. I can see where naysayers to the label in regards to this album are coming from.

facupm
July 18th 2015


12094 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

thing is album rules

FlyheadMetal
July 18th 2015


2422 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

toxik heathen yah

Ocean of Noise
July 18th 2015


11368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@MySirLordGentleman: prog is more of an adjective than an actual genre on its own. progressive rock is rock with progressive elements. progressive metal is metal with progressive elements.



when you call something "prog" it just means it has prog elements. it's not really a distinct genre on its own because pretty well any genre can have the term attached to it.

FlyheadMetal
July 18th 2015


2422 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

blackened rotates time sigs like fuck

Ocean of Noise
July 18th 2015


11368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

album rules [2]

FlyheadMetal
July 18th 2015


2422 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

album sucks [6]

romulanrancor
July 18th 2015


7575 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

album sucks [7]

SomeSayShesNaive
July 18th 2015


535 Comments


This album is fantastic.

idontcareaboutthis
July 18th 2015


952 Comments


aren't you the dude who wrote the 1.5 review for obscura

SomeSayShesNaive
July 18th 2015


535 Comments


Yes, and I backed my opinions up quite well.

romulanrancor
July 18th 2015


7575 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

and the guy who wrote the 3.0 RIP review, The 2.5 painkiller review and the 4.0 jugulator review

idontcareaboutthis
July 18th 2015


952 Comments


lol i won't say anything else about that

SomeSayShesNaive
July 18th 2015


535 Comments


Obscura sucks. Deal with it.

Ovrot
July 18th 2015


13303 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

But obscura rules



Dem crunch tones



SomeSayShesNaive
July 18th 2015


535 Comments


Sure

Supercoolguy64
July 18th 2015


12007 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

SHORTEST STROOOAAAAHHH

SHORTEST STRAW HAVE BEEN PULLED

FOR

YOU

JamieTwort
July 18th 2015


26988 Comments


"prog is more of an adjective than an actual genre on its own. progressive rock is rock with progressive elements. progressive metal is metal with progressive elements.

when you call something "prog" it just means it has prog elements. it's not really a distinct genre on its own because pretty well any genre can have the term attached to it."

Prog was a musical movement during the late-60's and 70's more than anything else. Since then it has just become an adjective that is used to describe forms of music with any elements that relate to or resemble characteristics from to that movement.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy