Mumford and Sons Sigh No More
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
aok
August 4th 2011


4631 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

But this album is objectively bad and is targeted towards pop listeners who've never been exposed to any folk music




one part false and one part who gives a fuck. thanks for that bandwagon rant that told us nothing new

ffs
August 4th 2011


6376 Comments


he's right though, this is trite as hell and all the songs have pretty much the exact same fucking
retarded twee melodies


i still like it though bc who cares if it sounds nice

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
August 4th 2011


22503 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Oh no everyone with a rating above 2.5 (that's 414 of 512 people who have rated the album btw), this is "objectively bad".



Time to change our ratings I guess.

aok
August 4th 2011


4631 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yea, none of us were being objective enough about it. def a 2 now. gonna ignore the fact that i like

the beats a lot and its emotional in a way i appreciate

PussyWillow
August 4th 2011


7 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I'll admit I was on the fence out posting that one sentence. Should of cut it out but oh well. Album is still the worst one I've actually sat down and listened to.

Steoandnoodles
August 4th 2011


2832 Comments


Even though I dislike this album, not EVERYONE hates it. Even with critics it scored decently with
some (very bad with others).

It's difficult to ignore that though it's more accessible; at least it's a start for getting a younger
generation into folk music and accepting the banjo as more then a hill-billy joke.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
August 4th 2011


22503 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Something about the use of the word "objectively" just made that sentence sound too overbearing PW. But your admission is promising. Welcome to the site.

Steoandnoodles
August 4th 2011


2832 Comments


He certainly has a lot to say. =P =)

Nomad
October 28th 2011


247 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This is dreadful. If their second album results in them becoming a bigger band than Fleet Foxes then there is no justice in this world.

Crymsonblaze
October 28th 2011


8232 Comments


That fact that these guys get radio play is already proof of a lack of justice

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
October 29th 2011


22503 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Define "bigger", because... well... you could already make a case that they are.

AtavanHalen
October 29th 2011


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

OH MY GOD I CAN'T BELIEVE X IS MORE COMMERCIALLY SUCCESSFUL THAN Y, ESPECIALLY WHEN I PERSONALLY PREFER Y



WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
October 29th 2011


115458 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This rules I don't know what Nomad is talking about.

wabbit
October 29th 2011


7059 Comments


HATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
October 29th 2011


22503 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

And so the division continues.

Crymsonblaze
October 29th 2011


8232 Comments


i don't care if you don't like this, there hordes of artists that get way more radioplay that are infinitely worse


Without a doubt. These guys annoy me to no end though, far more than any horrible pop artist.

wabbit
October 30th 2011


7059 Comments


YES!!!!!!!




HAAAAAAAAAATE!!!

ITsHxCTOASTER
October 30th 2011


2520 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"I gave this a low score because it is the cuntiest thing I have ever heard"



I can't stop laughing at this



jefflebowski
October 30th 2011


8573 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Winter Winds, The Cave and Little Lion Man are fantastic songs, the rest is dull/average

jefflebowski
October 30th 2011


8573 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

yeah, seems it'd be hard to really summon up any really strong feelings either way on this album



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy