Album Rating: 3.5

Why not?

Album Rating: 5.0

Because it bears no resemblance to anything else Radiohead has done.

Album Rating: 3.5

So what? The exact same line-up recorded a debut 2(!) years before "The Bends". Not like everything's changed in between, it was just a different sound.

Album Rating: 4.5

it's just that radiohead weren't radiohead yet when they recorded pablo. i mean it's still officially a radiohead album but it has no identity tbh

Album Rating: 5.0

HOW DO YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU?

Album Rating: 4.0

Great album.

Album Rating: 3.5

@Artuma



Well, that's their fault. It is still them, who fucked that up (although PH isn't even bad). I mean, it doesn't work the other way round either. If they would turn all crappy now and lose everything that made them them it would still be a Radiohead record.

Album Rating: 4.5

dude it's just some nobodies playing average britpop songs

Album Rating: 5.0

The first and last few songs on Pablo Honey are great, it's around 3/3.5 for me. Even if it's not as good as The Bends or OK Computer it still fits with that trilogy of albums in the 90s before they played the more experimental rock and electronica style of their 00's albums.

Album Rating: 3.5

I think I like Pablo Honey a lot more than most fans, it's no lower than 3/3.5 range for me and the first and last songs are great [2]

One of the few albums where opener and closer are the best tracks

Album Rating: 3.0

They were still nobodies when they recorded The Bends

Album Rating: 4.5

yeah but they had found their own sound when they recorded it. which wasn't the case on pablo



"One of the few albums where opener and closer are the best tracks"



one of the few?

Album Rating: 3.0

But that happens with most bands. They were still "finding their sound" during Kid A anyway.

Album Rating: 5.0

tbh they're still finding their sound

like literally theres no 2 radiohead albums that sound the same

maybe besides kid a/amnesiac

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, the "radiohead weren't radiohead yet" is bullshite

Album Rating: 3.5

~one of the few?~



Couldn't name many. Mostly cause I don't get off that much on closers like most other people do. Being a statistics freak, I actually once looked through all my albums and where my fav tracks are and it turned out only about 5% are closers. It was the worst more often

Album Rating: 4.5

"tbh they're still finding their sound"



their sound has been easily recognizable since the bends. of course, they made some drastic changes on kid a and they haven't done the same album twice but if it wasn't for thom's voice i couldn't tell if the band playing on pablo is radiohead, which can't be said about their other albums



"Being a statistics freak, I actually once looked through all my albums and where my fav tracks are and it turned out only about 5% are closers. It was the worst more often"



weird. on quite a lot of my fave albums the closer and the opener are the best tracks

Album Rating: 3.5

Opener yes, closer no. Actually The Tourist is for example my least fav on OKC



And there's no way you could tell that Kid A and The Bends come from the same guys if it weren't for Thom's whining

Album Rating: 5.0

And there's no way you could tell that Kid A and The Bends come from the same guys if it weren't for Thom's

whining

Album Rating: 3.0

If you gave someone instrumental versions of Optimistic and 2+2=5 to listen to and they didn't know RH, I'm pretty certain they'd say they were separate bands.