Metallica St. Anger
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Steerpike
March 3rd 2007


1861 Comments


it's pratically not debatlable that Metallica's first four album were some of the greatist thrash

Actually, yeah it is.
hell metal albums of all time.

Now that's total bullshit.


Eliminator
March 3rd 2007


2067 Comments


Yeah, that's total bullshit. What do you think you're doing?

Listen to Bathory, dude.

Sepstrup
March 3rd 2007


1567 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

You can personally think Metallica sucks but it's pratically not debatlable that Metallica's first four album were some of the greatist thrash, hell metal albums of all time. Don't go thinking I'm just some Metallica fanboy either. Just check out my profile and see what I listen to if you need proof. Also like I said I think Black Album era Metallica sucks




A lot of Metallica fanboys think that.

BeholderOfTheEye
March 3rd 2007


15 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

For Metallica this album i wouldn't even rate it but if i had to it would be a 1/5 for them, if it wasn't metallica maybe a 1.5/5

Sepstrup
March 3rd 2007


1567 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

What's that supposed to mean? A bad album is a bad album.

BeholderOfTheEye
March 3rd 2007


15 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

yea a bad album is a bad album but if it came from an unsigned band it wouldnt have so over-anticipated the way it was for metallica. I mean it just wasn't the expected metallica, if a band otherwise would have put it out it might have been a different kinda strange story. Most of the time when something is highly anticipated you can get just what u expect or get less. thats why its so hard for bands to be consistent especially like metallica, it common sense.

Steerpike
March 3rd 2007


1861 Comments


if a band otherwise would have put it out it might have been a different kinda strange story.

No it would have still sucked like Tom Cruise at a gay p0rn convention. A bad album is a bad album, regardless of who the schmucks were who made it. The band the bad album came from should not affect the rating in the least. What you are using is essentially the continuation of the same logic fanboys use on my to tell me that Master of Puppets deserves at least a 4.

chimera908
March 4th 2007


713 Comments


It's really getting to the point where it's just a clash of opinions. Nobody can win this argument. But by god don't call me a Metallica fanboy I only have two of their freakin albums, haha. Master of Puppets, which I enjoy a lot and The Black Album which I think is merely average heavy metal.

By the way BFHurricane I might buy this soon just so I can formulate a good opinion on it.

As of 3/4/07 I also now own ...And Justice For All, but I still only own 3 Metallica CDs, haha.This Message Edited On 03.04.07

ZFighter142
March 20th 2007


205 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yes! shit anger went down to a 2.2 now!

MrKite
March 20th 2007


5020 Comments


Are the members of Metallica aware of how much this is disliked? Just wondering cause if they do they didn't show it on the thing I watched about them.

WARPATH_88
March 20th 2007


514 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yea I heard one of them say they actually like being hated again. So i guess it doesnt bother them.

thecrimsonghost
April 2nd 2007


15 Comments


This is my favourite metallica album O.o

wakeupdead
April 2nd 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is my favourite metallica album O.o
WOW! Even though I like this album it's nowhere near their best IMO.

Huskeraider
April 13th 2007


1 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

This album is so bad. I love Metallica but after listening to this for a 3rd time and not figuring out what they were trying to accomplish, I gave it to a friend....... he gave it back. i could not get rid of it... I use it as a coaster on my desk. A testament to what can happen if you think too hard.

Ruthlessgrunge
April 13th 2007


460 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah I dont like this one either.

Stalusk
April 13th 2007


130 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

There are too many negatives here, you try to like it but it's impossible. Hetfield's vocals, the production, many of the songs are too long. If it was a new band with their first album you could understand, but these guys are kings and just dropped the ball badly. Nothing will ever overshadow the brilliance of their first four albums, but this was average at best.

ZFighter142
April 17th 2007


205 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

well I hope metallica pulls off a kick ass album this year..

wakeupdead
April 17th 2007


2229 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

well I hope metallica pulls off a kick *** album this year..
Me too.

TBrown87
April 17th 2007


52 Comments


I acrually liked this one. Much better than Load or reload, and a couple songs sounded alomst like the amazing thrash of old(Frantic). Not all that bad

ZFighter142
April 17th 2007


205 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ehh...this is the worst metallica album...Frantic is ok..it just gets very Repetitive..so does every other song. but everyone has there opinions.This Message Edited On 04.17.07



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy