Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
dude dont worry i was 11 once as well, i used to think pink floyd was boring too then i got an attention span at around 12 and a half
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
lol
|
| |
immolashun
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
kill just admit you like boring music and cant handle the complexity of new prog
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yeah, Periphery is too tech for me. Gotta tone it down a bit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
complexity eh, i'd like to see periphery play close to the edge, they'd prob fuck up within the first minute
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
whatever that is im sure theyd have no problem playing it, they covered metallica perfectly
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
You're joking, right?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
i mean from a technical standpoint
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
no im srs
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
dude i was bein serious why you gota bring up metallica damn
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
have you heard their cover tho
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
no but as everyone knows metallica arent very technical i mean you cant be serious right i mean come on
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
true
|
| |
seek and destroy started math metal
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
ok that was a bad example but all im saying is that periphery is more tech than 70s prog bands so theyd have no problem covering them
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Remedial math metal, maybe.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
inserrection once again you talk about shit you dont know i mean have you even heard close to the edge? and the 70s prog bands were tech as fuck even necrofagist couldnt play la villa, well they prob could but it owuld suck
|
| |
have you seen muhammed try and cover owl city?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
dude limp bizkit is better than periphery, and they suck
|
| |
|
|
