Album Rating: 4.5
Nah, not really. I mean outside of the obvious shared genre and time period, they differ plenty.
|
| |
the three albums that always get compared (this, forever changes, and odessey and oracle) arent really all that similar yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
agreed. o&o tells a series of fables often in a detached yet familiar tone whereas pet sounds is more internalized, in way that makes it less encompassing but more personal. forever changes is much less clear and more subtle in its approaches to lyrical and songwriting.
|
| |
forever changes is prob my fav but they're all hrad 4.5s
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
pretty much 5s honestly. the most holy trinity of 60s psych pop
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Need to look into Forever Changes i guess
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yes yes you do. fair warning it's much much more subtle than this but when it's hits it's complete gold.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I realized this was a perfect album basically first jam, but a lot of my favorite artists have taken heavy influence from this, I guess that's why
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
rating buuump
|
| |
this review is awful
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The majority of the reviews from early sput are pretty bad in general.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
still worst staff review ever
|
| |
thats because its a soundoff
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Damn man, he's a person too, you know.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
a person who doesn't log in here anymore
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Also I thought this would be an easy 5 for SirLord.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
not proggy enough?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The guy on the last page
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
MrSirLordGentleman
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Nah, cool songs, but I don't think there's anything special on any of them
|
| |
|
|
