Album Rating: 3.0

yes this is quite different to the first wave of... oh wait, no you don't have those rated

I was thinking 'different to GY!BE' is a possibility despite there being more obvious similarities, but nope. In fact DON'T czech them, they will ruin every other band of this ilk

you like Sigur Ros, so hmm yes okay they are different and unique, there will never be another Jonsi

Album Rating: 4.5

Yes, I am not so well versed in this genre. But tbf I find it tiring and need a break after a while.

I always want to check GY!BE, but I also always forget about them. The same was true with this band tbh

Album Rating: 3.0

It's a vague descriptor for an incredibly versatile genre. This sounds nothing like the early-mid 90s post-rock (i.e. the best, most creative kind), which is why it's separated into 'waves'

idk, if you like the idea of following the progressive origins, where bands incorporated everything from more angular guitars, kraut rhythms, electronic influences, jazz, looser structures etc. to produce something unique and distinct from one another, then those early years are they way to go imo.

Album Rating: 4.5

It sound amazing actually, so I'll give it a try

Album Rating: 3.0

nice, to be clear I am referencing the following...

Glenn Branca (the grandfather, for the origins of), Slint, Talk Talk, Bark Psychosis, Tortoise, Labradford etc.

This list may or may not have been used twenty times across different threads, in slightly varying forms, lol