Album Rating: 5.0
Yeah, definitely. This one is probably my favorite of the four new ones I've seen on Youtube. I like WTF a lot too. Especially the bridge. I guess my hopes are coming back up at least somewhat.
|
| |
I'm the same. I found 'WTF' to be the catchiest but 'We Are Young' was definitely overall the best. =)
I reckon once we hear the first studio track; our hype will hit the roof.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Apparently they're working together with Panic! at the Disco on a track that will be released on Spin on May 12th.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
There's a 100% chance that song will suck
|
| |
Yep, no doubt.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
There's a 100% chance that song will suck
really?! not a chance.
|
| |
Ever since they signed with Fueled by Ramen; my expectations for the new album have been low.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Agreed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
such an amazing album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
I can't see it being less than a 4 on the basis that Nate Ruess seems not to know how to release anything bad.
|
| |
Yeah but Nate has been chillin' with those Paramore and Panic! guys too long now. -.-
I don't like it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
The fact that Brandon Urie will have influence on the new track has banished it to suckdom before it's even released
|
| |
i hate the stylization of this band's name. pretentious cunts
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Yeah because that makes them pretentious. You make so much sense.
|
| |
fun. are not pretentious at all.
If there is one thing I know about Nate; he's a humble gentleman.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Yeah, but there's a period after fun so that makes them pretentious because that makes sense.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
periods are pretentious
|
| |
Didn't they do that for copy right reasons though?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I don't know, but it sounds pleasantly obscure in any case.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Doesn't matter. Pretentious.
|
| |
|
|