Album Rating: 5.0
One of the best modern bands that are going strong today and in their prime, they will only thrive further from here and expand their critically acclaimed catalog
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
band struggles to do anything well during their entire discography, despite having some cool ideas
|
| |
Have you even heard The Walk?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
You can't stop Tundra. You can only hope to contain him.
|
| |
Tundra more like bad opinions lol rekt
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
dang
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Tundra don't listen to the haters. Spread the good word. God bless the prophet Tundra!!!!!!!
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
wow... Drifter, that one hurt man
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
stop it before you hurt yourself
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
The vocal layering after P1 is atrocious [2]
I never liked the layering for some reason, but I can't tell why
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Who is hurting them selves exactly?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Damn, Catch Fire sucks
|
| |
Debut is best Periphery, that album actually rules.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I love this band, I can see why others hate them though. They're pretty much the epitome of a marmite band, love em or hate em.
P1 is their worst by far, way too over the top, you can tell the vocals were an afterthought. Not many songs have cohesion to them. All New Materials has possibly one of the most gorgeous openings ever but then after the chorus it does a sharp u turn and the verse just doesn't fit at all, then when the chorus comes back it sounds so out of left field. It's a mesh of different ideas rather than one stream of consciousness. The first album is full of it, it's like they went "I've got this cool 1 minute idea, let's just jam it into the middle of the song with no thought of how it links in with the rest of the song".
Compare that to Marigold or Catch Fire, way tighter songwriting cuz they're actual songs rather than random riff #1 goes to random riff #2.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
This band is actually fun sometimes, but they just can't pull off emotions imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"P1 is their worst by far, way too over the top, you can tell the vocals were an afterthought. Not many songs have cohesion to them. All New Materials has possibly one of the most gorgeous openings ever but then after the chorus it does a sharp u turn and the verse just doesn't fit at all, then when the chorus comes back it sounds so out of left field. It's a mesh of different ideas rather than one stream of consciousness. The first album is full of it, it's like they went "I've got this cool 1 minute idea, let's just jam it into the middle of the song with no thought of how it links in with the rest of the song"."
Probably because the vocals were an afterthought. P1 and P2 are mostly bulb demos. Juggernaut and P3 are where the band actually started to collaborate.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
P2 is the worst. most of the songs overstay their welcome, and its like a culmination of my problems with this album, except in every song
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"most of the songs overstay their welcome, and its like a culmination of my problems with this album, except in every song"
1. "Muramasa" 2:51
2. "Have a Blast" (Guthrie Govan guest solo) 5:55
3. "Facepalm Mute" 4:54
4. "Ji" 5:15
5. "Scarlet" 4:09
6. "Luck as a Constant" 6:05
7. "Ragnarok" 6:36
8. "The Gods Must Be Crazy!" 3:38
9. "Make Total Destroy" 4:27
10. "Erised" (John Petrucci guest solo) 6:13
11. "Epoch" (Instrumental) 2:11
12. "Froggin' Bullfish" 5:06
13. "Mile Zero" (Wes Hauch guest solo) 5:31
14. "Masamune" 6:09
No songs over 7 mins.... get thefuckaouttaheeeeeere
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
over 5 min is too much for a lot of these songs lmao
|
| |
agreed. 1-2 min. songs would make their albums more enjoyable.
|
| |
|
|