Point proven
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
guise stop fighting :[
|
| |
3 will do I guess
Seriously got no intention whatsoever of ever listening to this again and that's pretty bad
|
| |
http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/internet+fight_27689e_4171596.gif
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Please explain how this is sub-par music fish.
2.5 means average fyi.
|
| |
2.5 means average fyi.
And what exactly do you define "average" as?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
not bad not good, unremarkable, similar to stuff from the same genre but doesn't do anything to stand out
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Something can be average and bad though but that's pretty rare
Like the average deathcore album is terrible, and the best deathcore albums are just bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Aka not this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
ANKA
also not known as
Starting a new acronym trend boom
|
| |
Yeah but when you say "not good" or "bad" does it mean you like nothing about it. Cos I wouldn't say this is bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
So, referring to something as a poor effort isn't the same as saying it's bad?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Like the average deathcore album is terrible, and the best deathcore albums are just bad
trebor i will cut you tha funk in half with a chainsaw and engorge myself on your dripping goretuity
|
| |
I don't really pay attention to the words that go next to the numbers but if you define "poor" simply as something you don't particularly enjoy much then sure.
I never really saw the point in rating albums based on how "bad" sounding they were
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Maybe he's on the opposite of the Greg84.5 scale where 2 means excellent and 3 is classic or something
|
| |
Staff maturity nice
|
| |
I don't think I've seen many if any users who have as low an average rating as me with the amount of ratings I have so maybe I do just rate differently to other people
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
you're unique for sure fish
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Album is dope.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
hahaha thank you john
|
| |
|
|
